1 2011-02-08 00:02:25 <luke-jr> nothing
2 2011-02-08 00:02:31 <luke-jr> probably one should be deprecated
3 2011-02-08 00:03:36 <andrew12> indeed
4 2011-02-08 00:03:43 <nanotube> tcatm: should i resend without encryption?
5 2011-02-08 00:04:30 <luke-jr> yet another change for RPC v1 :p
6 2011-02-08 00:05:16 <tcatm> nanotube: no worked fine, just took a few minutes to open :)
7 2011-02-08 00:12:21 <Kiba> trading volume so minicule today
8 2011-02-08 00:13:17 <tcatm> preparing to crash :)
9 2011-02-08 00:13:33 <Cusipzzz> sell mortimer sell !
10 2011-02-08 00:21:13 <genjix> ;;bc,blocks
11 2011-02-08 00:21:15 <gribble> 106813
12 2011-02-08 00:34:16 <dirtyfilthy> andrew12: it'd better be literally crazy. like 1/4000 chance of randomly dumping all your bitcoins on to market at half market price
13 2011-02-08 00:35:32 <andrew12> dirtyfilthy: what?
14 2011-02-08 00:35:45 <dirtyfilthy> you're crazy ruby library
15 2011-02-08 00:35:51 <dirtyfilthy> your
16 2011-02-08 00:35:54 <andrew12> oh
17 2011-02-08 00:35:57 <andrew12> i misread what you said
18 2011-02-08 00:36:52 <andrew12> http://pastie.org/1539235
19 2011-02-08 00:40:47 <dirtyfilthy> insert this line somewhere: sell(balance,rand*2) if rand(4000)==23
20 2011-02-08 00:40:56 <dirtyfilthy> mix it up a little
21 2011-02-08 00:53:24 <andrew12> heh
22 2011-02-08 00:54:23 <andrew12> ;;bc,stats
23 2011-02-08 00:54:25 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106819 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 28 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 3 hours, 44 minutes, and 0 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25901.61238963
24 2011-02-08 00:54:30 <andrew12> 3 hours
25 2011-02-08 00:54:39 <andrew12> well 4
26 2011-02-08 00:55:17 <Syke> one of those 28 blocks better be mine!
27 2011-02-08 00:55:30 <andrew12> I know they won't be mine :P
28 2011-02-08 00:56:10 <andrew12> well they might be
29 2011-02-08 00:58:30 <luke-jr> Syke: no, mine!
30 2011-02-08 00:58:42 <luke-jr> I've been going for 4 days ;.;
31 2011-02-08 00:58:47 <Syke> i'll race you
32 2011-02-08 00:58:53 <Syke> i'm clocking in at 860 MH/s
33 2011-02-08 00:59:01 <luke-jr> ;.;
34 2011-02-08 00:59:09 <luke-jr> 265 MH/s is all I can handle
35 2011-02-08 00:59:35 <presence> Has m0mchil uploaded a windows exe of the new poclbm?
36 2011-02-08 01:06:03 <presence> Im getting 281Mh/s from rpcminer, but I cant get diablo's miner to go over 14M and rpcminer to report a hash at all.
37 2011-02-08 01:13:28 <Syke> try smaller 'w' values, like "-w 64" or "-w 128"
38 2011-02-08 01:13:43 <Syke> for diablominer
39 2011-02-08 01:14:50 <citiz3n> for some reason, both GPUs aren't showing up as usable for me
40 2011-02-08 01:14:56 <citiz3n> they are listed in device manager
41 2011-02-08 01:15:05 <citiz3n> but CCC doesn't show them both
42 2011-02-08 01:15:09 <citiz3n> neither does m0mchil's miner :(
43 2011-02-08 01:16:50 <presence> citizen: are they in crossfire?
44 2011-02-08 01:18:02 <presence> hm, 128 and 64 make things worse with diablo's miner
45 2011-02-08 01:18:13 <presence> 512 ands 1024 cause a kernel error
46 2011-02-08 01:18:19 <citiz3n> i have never enabled crossfire
47 2011-02-08 01:18:29 <slush> citiz3n: two 5870?
48 2011-02-08 01:18:32 <citiz3n> and it doesn't even see to be enableable in CCC
49 2011-02-08 01:18:35 <citiz3n> yes slush
50 2011-02-08 01:18:52 <slush> two 5970 never worked in Win for me
51 2011-02-08 01:18:58 <slush> Don't know how two 5870
52 2011-02-08 01:19:08 <citiz3n> yeah
53 2011-02-08 01:19:09 <citiz3n> hmm
54 2011-02-08 01:25:19 <Diablo-D3> ...
55 2011-02-08 01:25:24 <Diablo-D3> presence: you're doing it wrong.
56 2011-02-08 01:25:32 <Diablo-D3> -w 64 is most optimum.
57 2011-02-08 01:26:49 <Diablo-D3> most likely you have your box configured wrong
58 2011-02-08 01:27:21 <afed> when are we going to have a way to run opencl with no x server :(
59 2011-02-08 01:27:28 <Diablo-D3> never.
60 2011-02-08 01:27:34 <ArtForz> we already do
61 2011-02-08 01:27:42 <afed> o
62 2011-02-08 01:28:25 <ArtForz> well, at least if you have another graphics card you can use for primary VGA
63 2011-02-08 01:29:13 <afed> i thought you had to have a display on each gpu you wanted to use
64 2011-02-08 01:29:20 <ArtForz> yes
65 2011-02-08 01:29:29 <Netsniper> -w 64 -r 5 -f 2500
66 2011-02-08 01:29:33 <ArtForz> then hand the radeons to a VM with PCI passthrough
67 2011-02-08 01:29:56 <Diablo-D3> -f over 1000 doesnt make sense
68 2011-02-08 01:30:00 <Netsniper> i dont even know what those options do specificly - i just use them because if i don't, the screen gets bogged down
69 2011-02-08 01:30:02 <Diablo-D3> most people dont even run 1000hz clocks
70 2011-02-08 01:30:04 <afed> ok, that is going the wrong way in terms of complexity
71 2011-02-08 01:30:14 <afed> i want to boil it down to a kernel and ramdisk that PXE boot
72 2011-02-08 01:31:01 <Netsniper> Diablo-D3: if i use a lower value, my video suffers
73 2011-02-08 01:31:06 <ArtForz> err... so?
74 2011-02-08 01:31:07 <Diablo-D3> you're on nvidia?
75 2011-02-08 01:31:16 <ArtForz> what cant a nfs-/ image not run X?
76 2011-02-08 01:31:17 <Netsniper> yes, 8800gt
77 2011-02-08 01:31:19 <Diablo-D3> thats why
78 2011-02-08 01:31:22 <Diablo-D3> nvidia cant be fixed.
79 2011-02-08 01:31:47 <afed> i heard 8800gt cards are terminal cases
80 2011-02-08 01:31:49 <afed> built wrong
81 2011-02-08 01:31:54 <afed> 100% failure rate
82 2011-02-08 01:31:57 <Netsniper> ha
83 2011-02-08 01:32:08 <Netsniper> i ran gpugrid before bitcoin
84 2011-02-08 01:32:11 <ArtForz> actually thats the complete 8xxx and 9xxx generation
85 2011-02-08 01:32:12 <Diablo-D3> thats EVERY nvidia card
86 2011-02-08 01:32:57 <presence> diablo: what should the parms be for an ati-5870? I get 291M/s with m0mchils, but 14M/sec with yours...something is definitely wrong
87 2011-02-08 01:34:30 <Syke> I think my 5870s run with "-w 256 -f 1"
88 2011-02-08 01:34:59 <ArtForz> w > 64 should generally be *slower* for 58xx
89 2011-02-08 01:35:16 <ArtForz> w < 64 is also slower
90 2011-02-08 01:35:47 <presence> w of 64 cut me down to 6M/sec
91 2011-02-08 01:36:32 <ArtForz> wtf
92 2011-02-08 01:36:39 <ArtForz> somethings seriously wrong with your setup
93 2011-02-08 01:36:54 <ArtForz> which devices does diablos miner say it's using?
94 2011-02-08 01:38:40 <presence> well its not entirely wrong since momchils is working as far as hardware goes
95 2011-02-08 01:38:52 <presence> but Im at -f 1000 -w 256 getting 14M
96 2011-02-08 01:39:00 <presence> lemme look at the output
97 2011-02-08 01:40:09 <presence> C:Program Files (x86)BitcoinDiabloMiner>java -cp targetlibs*;targetDiabloMiner-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -Djava.library.path=targetlibs\nativeswindows com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner -u xxx-p yyy -f 1000 -w 256
98 2011-02-08 01:40:13 <presence> [2/7/11 7:39:10 PM] Started
99 2011-02-08 01:40:15 <presence> [2/7/11 7:39:11 PM] Added Cypress (#1) (20 CU, local work size of 256)
100 2011-02-08 01:40:18 <presence> 15031/14721 khash/sec
101 2011-02-08 01:41:15 <Syke> try -f 1
102 2011-02-08 01:42:54 <ArtForz> is that a 5870 ?
103 2011-02-08 01:43:22 <presence> 5870
104 2011-02-08 01:45:18 <Netsniper> i'm using m0mchils
105 2011-02-08 01:45:37 <presence> ok, with -f 1 it gets an average of 290M but the system is unresponsive
106 2011-02-08 01:45:44 <presence> trying -w 64
107 2011-02-08 01:45:54 <presence> java crashed :(
108 2011-02-08 01:46:46 <presence> -w 64 is about the same, but my system is still laggy :(
109 2011-02-08 01:46:57 <presence> just raising and lowering windows :(
110 2011-02-08 01:53:27 <Diablo-D3> [09:40:15] <presence> [2/7/11 7:39:11 PM] Added Cypress (#1) (20 CU, local work size of 256)
111 2011-02-08 01:53:32 <Diablo-D3> a single 5870?
112 2011-02-08 01:53:38 <Diablo-D3> presence: what driver and sdk
113 2011-02-08 01:55:04 <luke-jr> try -f 100 ?
114 2011-02-08 01:55:42 <luke-jr> tbh, I can't use my Radeon if it's mining even with that
115 2011-02-08 01:55:45 <Diablo-D3> luke-jr: that wont make it faster.
116 2011-02-08 01:55:48 <luke-jr> I just use my IGP :P
117 2011-02-08 01:58:42 <presence> its a single 5870, yes
118 2011-02-08 01:59:36 <presence> I have the most current drivers and sdk...and although I know that it is not 100% compatible with some miners, m0mchils is giving reasonable results with them without tuning or overclocking
119 2011-02-08 02:00:30 <presence> yours was performing at 5% better, but I couldnt use the machine while it mines, which is a necessity
120 2011-02-08 02:00:57 <Diablo-D3> presence: thats where you went wrong
121 2011-02-08 02:01:08 <andrew12> interesting. my desktop mines the best with the cryptopp_asm32 algo
122 2011-02-08 02:01:08 <Diablo-D3> do not use 11.1 or 10.12, and only use sdk 2.1
123 2011-02-08 02:01:30 <presence> m0mchil's apparently is ok with current with 2.2
124 2011-02-08 02:01:33 <Diablo-D3> its not.
125 2011-02-08 02:01:39 <Diablo-D3> 2.1 is faster with both mine and m0's
126 2011-02-08 02:01:49 <Diablo-D3> and both mine and m0s will run like utter shit on 11.1
127 2011-02-08 02:01:56 <presence> Hmm...
128 2011-02-08 02:02:05 <presence> this is 293M/s with current
129 2011-02-08 02:02:14 <Diablo-D3> thats low
130 2011-02-08 02:02:15 <presence> should I expect a bost of 10% with 10.12?
131 2011-02-08 02:02:20 <ArtForz> wow thats bad
132 2011-02-08 02:02:22 <Diablo-D3> switch to 10.11
133 2011-02-08 02:02:26 <Diablo-D3> and sdk 2.1
134 2011-02-08 02:02:44 <presence> it never hurts to try
135 2011-02-08 02:02:53 <Diablo-D3> presence: you should be able to get past 315
136 2011-02-08 02:02:55 <ArtForz> even m0s old miner got ~310 out of a stock 5870 on a decently set up system
137 2011-02-08 02:03:07 <presence> stock?
138 2011-02-08 02:03:16 <ArtForz> yes, stock
139 2011-02-08 02:03:32 <presence> ok, downloading 10.12 cap2
140 2011-02-08 02:03:50 <Diablo-D3> 10.11.
141 2011-02-08 02:03:52 <andrew12> nini guys
142 2011-02-08 02:03:53 <presence> do I have to do anything special to remove this old/new driver before install?
143 2011-02-08 02:03:55 <ArtForz> *headdesk*
144 2011-02-08 02:04:05 <Diablo-D3> 10.12 has issues for a small percentage of users
145 2011-02-08 02:04:08 <Diablo-D3> cant figure out whyt
146 2011-02-08 02:04:17 <Diablo-D3> its not a horrid fuckup like 11.1 is
147 2011-02-08 02:04:17 <presence> ok, it didnt list 10.11, had to go to the archive
148 2011-02-08 02:04:58 <ArtForz> hmmm... it's ATI, their shit only works on accident
149 2011-02-08 02:05:04 <presence> hahaha
150 2011-02-08 02:05:15 <presence> is there a video manufacturer you dont loathe?
151 2011-02-08 02:05:22 <Diablo-D3> hrm, no
152 2011-02-08 02:05:26 <ArtForz> nope
153 2011-02-08 02:05:26 <Diablo-D3> ati is the only one worth buying
154 2011-02-08 02:05:28 <Diablo-D3> they suck the least
155 2011-02-08 02:05:38 <ArtForz> at least ati makes decent hardware
156 2011-02-08 02:05:56 <presence> is just uninstalling the driver enough, or do I have to scrub?
157 2011-02-08 02:06:57 <ArtForz> I prefer uninstall+scrub, but thats just my general paranoia
158 2011-02-08 02:07:15 <presence> unfortunately, with video drivers its a founded belief
159 2011-02-08 02:07:28 <presence> nvidia asses your system if you dont scrub
160 2011-02-08 02:07:32 <ArtForz> so does ATI
161 2011-02-08 02:07:47 <presence> awesome
162 2011-02-08 02:07:57 <ArtForz> had major issues with a 4870 and 10.5/6/7
163 2011-02-08 02:08:20 <presence> but it gets the windows logo :D
164 2011-02-08 02:09:01 <presence> gots to reboot, brb
165 2011-02-08 02:15:11 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
166 2011-02-08 02:15:13 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106833 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 14 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 46 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25958.75370955
167 2011-02-08 02:16:10 <luke-jr> if my GPU miner worked with slush's, it should work without, right? :/
168 2011-02-08 02:16:31 <luke-jr> I suppose, I really only have a 50% chance of getting a block in the bc,calc timeframe, don't I? :/
169 2011-02-08 02:16:41 <ArtForz> errr... no
170 2011-02-08 02:16:49 <ArtForz> it's about 60% iirc
171 2011-02-08 02:17:10 <ArtForz> 63%
172 2011-02-08 02:17:12 <luke-jr> so I'm just unlucky? :/
173 2011-02-08 02:19:09 <presence> hmm
174 2011-02-08 02:19:18 <presence> it reinstalled sdk 2.3.00
175 2011-02-08 02:19:21 <presence> WTF
176 2011-02-08 02:20:11 <midnightmagic> ;;bc,stats
177 2011-02-08 02:20:21 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106834 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 13 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 43 minutes, and 21 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25964.40322824
178 2011-02-08 02:20:33 <luke-jr> :\n220750
179 2011-02-08 02:23:51 <dissipate> hello
180 2011-02-08 02:26:56 <Syke> everyone's busy watching to see who gets the last 13 blocks before difficulty increases...
181 2011-02-08 02:30:12 <dissipate> what is the difficulty going up to now?
182 2011-02-08 02:30:34 <luke-jr> 26k
183 2011-02-08 02:30:54 <dissipate> uh oh
184 2011-02-08 02:30:56 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 265000 Khps, given the supplied difficulty of 26000, is 4 days, 21 hours, 3 minutes, and 13 seconds
185 2011-02-08 02:30:56 <luke-jr> ;;bc,calcd 265000 26000
186 2011-02-08 02:30:58 <dissipate> crank up those GPUs
187 2011-02-08 02:31:01 <luke-jr> ;;bc,calc 265000
188 2011-02-08 02:31:13 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 265000 Khps, given current difficulty of 22012.4941572 , is 4 days, 3 hours, 6 minutes, and 5 seconds
189 2011-02-08 02:31:30 <luke-jr> 18 hours extra :/
190 2011-02-08 02:32:05 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
191 2011-02-08 02:32:06 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106835 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 12 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 35 minutes, and 24 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25960.47969052
192 2011-02-08 02:40:41 <Syke> Did you know that each time a block is found, an angel gets its wings?
193 2011-02-08 02:41:05 <lfm> syke what are you smokin
194 2011-02-08 02:41:23 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
195 2011-02-08 02:41:25 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106838 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 9 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 11 minutes, and 15 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25980.26640211
196 2011-02-08 02:41:27 <luke-jr> 9!
197 2011-02-08 02:41:47 <ArtForz> 362880?
198 2011-02-08 02:44:28 <luke-jr> ?
199 2011-02-08 02:44:43 <ArtForz> 9!
200 2011-02-08 02:44:53 <dissipate> they need to decrease difficulty so 1 block per second is generated
201 2011-02-08 02:45:12 <lfm> dissipate: that'd suck
202 2011-02-08 02:45:13 <ArtForz> impossible
203 2011-02-08 02:45:49 <luke-jr> dissipate: who's "they"?
204 2011-02-08 02:45:51 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
205 2011-02-08 02:45:52 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106839 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 8 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 12 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25987.96938250
206 2011-02-08 02:46:00 <ArtForz> feel free to create a custom test network and watch it blow up spectacularly
207 2011-02-08 02:46:13 <lfm> dissipate: if you want more frequent payouts try a pool
208 2011-02-08 02:46:34 <luke-jr> & and get 50% your overall earnings
209 2011-02-08 02:46:49 <lfm> luke-jr: ?
210 2011-02-08 02:47:45 <dissipate> ArtForz, even on a LAN?
211 2011-02-08 02:48:45 <lfm> dissipate: try it
212 2011-02-08 02:50:36 <ArtForz> with >5 hops distance between furthest nodes it *will* start to diverge
213 2011-02-08 02:50:45 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
214 2011-02-08 02:50:47 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106839 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 8 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 12 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25987.96938250
215 2011-02-08 02:50:59 <luke-jr> ArtForz: you're assuming that's a problem
216 2011-02-08 02:51:16 <luke-jr> all it really means (maybe) is that you need a lot more verifications before you trust it
217 2011-02-08 02:51:24 <lfm> luke-jr: ? did you undrestand what he said?
218 2011-02-08 02:53:31 <presence> hmm...with 10.11 the results are lower.
219 2011-02-08 02:53:39 <presence> Do you have to install SDK 2.1 seperately?
220 2011-02-08 02:53:43 <ArtForz> yes
221 2011-02-08 02:53:49 <presence> ah
222 2011-02-08 02:53:57 <presence> it was integrated with the new drive
223 2011-02-08 02:53:58 <presence> r
224 2011-02-08 02:54:04 <ArtForz> yes
225 2011-02-08 02:57:00 <Kiba> time to cook up some coffee!
226 2011-02-08 02:57:05 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
227 2011-02-08 02:57:06 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106839 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 8 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 12 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25987.96938250
228 2011-02-08 03:02:02 <Syke> ;;bc,stats
229 2011-02-08 03:02:03 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106840 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 7 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 55 minutes and 25 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25975.08125336
230 2011-02-08 03:09:03 <luke-jr> ()%*&#%
231 2011-02-08 03:09:10 <luke-jr> just
232 2011-02-08 03:09:12 <luke-jr> one
233 2011-02-08 03:09:13 <luke-jr> block
234 2011-02-08 03:09:15 <luke-jr> plz
235 2011-02-08 03:09:18 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
236 2011-02-08 03:09:19 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106842 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 5 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 39 minutes and 35 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25989.69925085
237 2011-02-08 03:09:28 <luke-jr> aww, difficulty went way up with that one
238 2011-02-08 03:09:35 <luke-jr> and we lost a bunch of ETA
239 2011-02-08 03:10:52 <presence> ugh now getting some error in module stuff
240 2011-02-08 03:11:06 <presence> grr and it hosed my chrome links
241 2011-02-08 03:15:25 <presence> yeah, poclbm is now hosed :(
242 2011-02-08 03:15:48 <ArtForz> what error?
243 2011-02-08 03:29:35 <presence> Well, diablos miner works, about 310M/s
244 2011-02-08 03:29:42 <presence> but m0ms is hosed...no version will run now
245 2011-02-08 03:29:55 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
246 2011-02-08 03:29:56 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106843 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 4 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 31 minutes and 40 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25976.96652251
247 2011-02-08 03:29:57 <presence> and rpcminer-opencl runs, but its horrible
248 2011-02-08 03:30:30 <presence> m0ms states that a DLL did not load.
249 2011-02-08 03:32:20 <presence> diablo's works well, but it pretty much makes the system very slow
250 2011-02-08 03:32:25 <presence> probably java's doing
251 2011-02-08 03:34:46 <presence> it looks like its a pyopencl issue
252 2011-02-08 03:34:55 <presence> maybe something in the py2exe packaging
253 2011-02-08 03:38:59 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
254 2011-02-08 03:39:01 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106845 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 2 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 15 minutes and 50 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25984.35312908
255 2011-02-08 03:39:07 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
256 2011-02-08 03:39:08 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106845 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 2 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 15 minutes and 50 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25984.35312908
257 2011-02-08 03:39:55 <presence> File "poclbm.py", line 3, in <module>
258 2011-02-08 03:39:56 <presence> File "pyopencl__init__.pyc", line 3, in <module>
259 2011-02-08 03:43:23 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
260 2011-02-08 03:43:25 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106846 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 1 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 7 minutes and 55 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25993.78894618
261 2011-02-08 03:43:49 <luke-jr> I want that last block plz
262 2011-02-08 03:43:52 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
263 2011-02-08 03:43:53 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106846 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 1 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 7 minutes and 55 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25993.78894618
264 2011-02-08 03:43:55 <LobsterMan> hehehehehehe
265 2011-02-08 03:44:56 <Netsniper> :/
266 2011-02-08 03:45:15 <Netsniper> i haven't completed a block since september
267 2011-02-08 03:45:24 <LobsterMan> lol
268 2011-02-08 03:45:35 <LobsterMan> my last one was 1-28
269 2011-02-08 03:45:36 <luke-jr> Netsniper: what video card?
270 2011-02-08 03:45:51 <ArtForz> 45 and 43 were mine :P
271 2011-02-08 03:45:52 <ArtForz> ;;bc,stats
272 2011-02-08 03:45:53 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106847 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 0 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 4 days, 2 hours, and 0 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25997.87992881
273 2011-02-08 03:46:05 <luke-jr> noooooooooooooooooooooooooo
274 2011-02-08 03:46:13 <luke-jr> ;;bc,stats
275 2011-02-08 03:46:15 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106847 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 0 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 4 days, 2 hours, and 0 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25997.87992881
276 2011-02-08 03:46:21 <Netsniper> and i didn't start using my video card until about a month ago
277 2011-02-08 03:46:23 <Netsniper> so...
278 2011-02-08 03:46:41 <LobsterMan> i remember when diff was 1200 and generating via cpu only was actually viable
279 2011-02-08 03:46:51 <Netsniper> right
280 2011-02-08 03:46:55 <ArtForz> 25997.9 it is
281 2011-02-08 03:46:56 <LobsterMan> my first few blocks were from my i7 ^_^
282 2011-02-08 03:47:04 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
283 2011-02-08 03:47:05 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106847 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 0 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 4 days, 1 hour, 26 minutes, and 24 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25997.87992881
284 2011-02-08 03:47:14 <presence> is there some method to set up diablominer to make it be more friendly to gui usage?
285 2011-02-08 03:47:21 <doublec> i remember thinking what a waste of time generating with the cpu was since it'd take 2-3 weeks on average
286 2011-02-08 03:47:25 <Netsniper> i made about 120 block with cpu only :D
287 2011-02-08 03:47:36 <ArtForz> ghribble is wrong
288 2011-02-08 03:47:44 <LobsterMan> gribble is offby1 or something
289 2011-02-08 03:47:45 <ArtForz> current difficulty already IS 25997.9
290 2011-02-08 03:47:47 <LobsterMan> ;;bc,stats
291 2011-02-08 03:47:49 <gribble> Current Blocks: 106847 | Current Difficulty: 22012.4941572 | Next Difficulty At Block: 106847 | Next Difficulty In: 0 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 4 days, 1 hour, 26 minutes, and 24 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 25997.87992881
292 2011-02-08 03:48:19 <luke-jr> doublec: lol
293 2011-02-08 03:48:29 <ArtForz> yea
294 2011-02-08 03:48:32 <ArtForz> GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
295 2011-02-08 03:48:32 <nanotube> sup LobsterMan
296 2011-02-08 03:48:33 <ArtForz> nTargetTimespan = 1209600 nActualTimespan = 1024171
297 2011-02-08 03:48:34 <ArtForz> Before: 1b02fa29 000000000002fa29000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
298 2011-02-08 03:48:37 <LobsterMan> nanotube read up a few lines :P