1 2011-10-12 00:00:22 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr * r6c4d31d98088 gentoo/net-p2p/bitcoind/ (5 files): net-p2p/bitcoind: glib isn't required either
 2 2011-10-12 00:00:24 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr * rcfcecb4bfbc8 gentoo/net-p2p/bitcoin-qt/ (Manifest bitcoin-qt-9999.1.ebuild): net-p2p/bitcoin-qt-9999.1: Fix USE=-upnp
 3 2011-10-12 00:30:25 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr * r88b840763a5a gentoo/net-p2p/namecoin/ (25 files in 2 dirs): net-p2p/namecoin: Rewrite everything, starting over with versions 0.3.24.63 and 9999
 4 2011-10-12 00:40:17 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr * r4f778b2004f6 gentoo/ (17 files in 8 dirs): Upgrade all git ebuilds to git-2 eclass
 5 2011-10-12 01:20:15 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr * r3bf90850d519 gentoo/net-p2p/namecoin/ (4 files in 2 dirs): net-p2p/namecoin: Bugfix: namecoind wants bitcoin.conf, not namecoin.conf
 6 2011-10-12 04:01:21 <shadders> trying to figure out this scriptsig from coinbase transaction: 045dee091a02cd00
 7 2011-10-12 04:01:59 <shadders> I see the target nBits and I assume the last 3 bytes is extranonce
 8 2011-10-12 04:02:10 <shadders> 04<diff>5dee091a<extranonce>02cd00
 9 2011-10-12 04:02:53 <shadders> but what's the 04 at the start?  Is it an OP_PUSHDATA?  If so I guess it's wrong.
10 2011-10-12 04:04:12 <shadders> Since I can't see any sign OP_DROP ("75") I'm  guessing coinbase is never actually evaluated?