1 2011-10-25 00:00:02 <AAA_awright> I would think that should be a natural progression, towards libblockchain
  2 2011-10-25 00:00:09 <AAA_awright> (or whatever
  3 2011-10-25 00:00:11 <AAA_awright> )
  4 2011-10-25 00:00:53 <gmaxwell> AAA_awright: the amount of commonality is pretty small though.. I guess only enough to handle the indirection needed for merged mining is really common.
  5 2011-10-25 00:01:16 <AAA_awright> Really? There's all that networking code
  6 2011-10-25 00:01:34 <gmaxwell> That has nothing to do with the blockchain though.
  7 2011-10-25 00:02:18 <gmaxwell> You could participate in the bitcoin blockchain without ever touching the p2p protocol. And I expect that it will be completely replaced in the not very distant future, probably incrementally but several times over. :)
  8 2011-10-25 00:02:19 <Diablo-D3> lets just rename it libdongs then
  9 2011-10-25 00:09:48 <AAA_awright> gmaxwell: Well then a better name than libblockchain, or maybe a library on top of it since modularity is a Good Thing
 10 2011-10-25 01:02:41 <Siegfried> Hi, is anybody online?
 11 2011-10-25 01:07:45 <lfm> yes
 12 2011-10-25 03:08:48 <neofutur> anyone here familiar with bitcoind code and willing to develop a patch ( paid job in btc ot mtgusd )
 13 2011-10-25 03:51:50 <CIA-101> poolserverj: shadders * aad061a62be7 r166 / (17 files in 7 dirs):
 14 2011-10-25 03:51:51 <CIA-101> poolserverj: and fire the longpoll anyway after 1 second.
 15 2011-10-25 03:51:52 <CIA-101> poolserverj: - allow subtractive traceTargets. i.e. 'traceTargets=all,-merged' will show all traceTargets except 'merged'
 16 2011-10-25 05:11:58 <CIA-101> poolserverj: shadders * 7c8c3072b91c r167 / (4 files in 3 dirs): - fixes for block sync cases where sync tracking loses the plot and never fires block change.
 17 2011-10-25 06:38:44 <mrb_> I hate slideshare.net - click next to see the next page of a pdf and nothing happens. reload the page, this time I can go to page 2 or 3, then I can't advance anymore.
 18 2011-10-25 06:38:48 <mrb_> http://www.slideshare.net/dakami/bitcoin-8776098
 19 2011-10-25 06:39:00 <mrb_> anyone has a copy of the "some thoughts on bitcoin" kaminsky pdf?
 20 2011-10-25 06:40:06 <edcba> ask him maybe
 21 2011-10-25 06:51:11 <T_X> I'm having this 'error: too many arguments to function UPNPDev* upnpDiscover()' when trying to build bitcoin/master on a current debian unstable. ok, I could deactivate the miniupnp part in bitcoin according to the readme. but
 22 2011-10-25 06:51:31 <T_X> how should such library version incompatibilties usually be handled?
 23 2011-10-25 06:52:35 <T_X> (debian unstable has libminiupnpc-dev v1.5)
 24 2011-10-25 06:53:41 <T_X> should the bitcion developers make bitcoin compatible with both versions 1.5 and 1.6? or should the debian libminiupnpc-dev package maintainer offer both, a version 1.5 and 1.6 package?
 25 2011-10-25 07:00:11 <T_X> and I'm having some trouble the bitcoin-qt version
 26 2011-10-25 07:00:49 <T_X> when I'm hitting a 'qmake' in src/ (as described in readme-qt.rst), then I'm just getting the Usage screen of qmake
 27 2011-10-25 07:02:41 <T_X> ah, lol, 'qmake' from the top dir
 28 2011-10-25 07:02:43 <T_X> that works better
 29 2011-10-25 07:04:12 <ThomasV> what are the 4 bytes after each tx input ? are they always equal to "ffffff" ?
 30 2011-10-25 07:06:29 <T_X> hmm, 'qmake "USE_UPNP="' seems to ignore the upnp option
 31 2011-10-25 07:08:00 <terrytibbs> T_X: slap it in the makefile instead
 32 2011-10-25 07:08:40 <T_X> terrytibbs: I found a better way, reading the readme-qt.rst 10 times
 33 2011-10-25 07:08:54 <T_X> qmake uses USE_UPNP=-, not USE_UPNP=!
 34 2011-10-25 07:09:02 <T_X> ...
 35 2011-10-25 07:10:50 <T_X> *removing
 36 2011-10-25 07:12:36 <T_X> s/until it's not/until it's/
 37 2011-10-25 07:13:47 <T_X> urgh
 38 2011-10-25 07:13:49 <T_X> ./bitcoin-qt                                                                                                 <
 39 2011-10-25 07:13:52 <T_X> zsh: segmentation fault  ./bitcoin-qt
 40 2011-10-25 07:26:36 <T_X> wow, awesome, and bitcoin-qt has a millionaire feature :) - ???BTC!
 41 2011-10-25 07:26:53 <T_X> (somehow when starting it with gdb, then it doesn't crash...)
 42 2011-10-25 07:29:50 <T_X> the mouse over for the "Recent Transactions" in "Overview" seems to be broke too
 43 2011-10-25 07:30:12 <T_X> looks like random pixels stuff from some video buffers
 44 2011-10-25 07:33:15 <T_X> "Balance:" in "Send Coins" does not change it's unit when applying it in the settings - I'm no back to "BTC", however the Balance there still shows it in "???BTC"
 45 2011-10-25 07:45:24 <T_X> hmm, stupid race conditions... ./bitcoin-qt crashes all the time on start up, however running it with gdb or valgrind does not...
 46 2011-10-25 07:50:36 <ThomasV> heisenbug ?
 47 2011-10-25 07:59:11 <T_X> ThomasV: yep, looks like :)
 48 2011-10-25 08:04:00 <T_X> it crashed about two or three messages after the "loading block index", I think. but can't say for sure, it was too quick
 49 2011-10-25 08:04:26 <T_X> I guess then some classic couts would be next, I guess
 50 2011-10-25 09:10:23 <CIA-101> poolserverj: shadders * d2a36b35cff6 r168 / (5 files in 5 dirs): - added support for SCrypt as a proof of work hashing algorithm.
 51 2011-10-25 09:10:34 <anddam> hello
 52 2011-10-25 09:20:28 <anddam> jrmithdobbs: hi, you there?
 53 2011-10-25 10:49:29 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Chris Moore master * r6c33ec4 / doc/readme-qt.rst : Warn about the qt-at-spi bug in Ubuntu 11.10. - http://git.io/1FFYag
 54 2011-10-25 10:49:30 <CIA-101> bitcoin: Gavin Andresen master * r20601f3 / doc/readme-qt.rst :
 55 2011-10-25 11:10:46 <CIA-101> libbitcoin: genjix * ra4c72e202507 / (7 files in 4 dirs): Deleted extraneous code. About to be replaced by better code.
 56 2011-10-25 12:59:31 <ryannathansSLEEP> i came blood
 57 2011-10-25 12:59:52 <MagicalTux> ryannathansSLEEP: go to the hospital
 58 2011-10-25 13:00:46 <ryannathansSLEEP> naww
 59 2011-10-25 13:41:06 <ThomasV> gavinandresen: you have a minute to help me?
 60 2011-10-25 13:41:21 <gavinandresen> with what?
 61 2011-10-25 13:41:37 <ThomasV> I am trying to create a tx, but it does not work
 62 2011-10-25 13:41:39 <gavinandresen> (busy trying to get a 0.5rc2 built...)
 63 2011-10-25 13:42:21 <terrytibbs> When was the switch from rpc to bitcoinrpc made?!
 64 2011-10-25 13:42:34 <copumpkin> casascius: dude, not cool
 65 2011-10-25 13:42:35 <ThomasV> perhaps you are expert enough to parse it with your eyes
 66 2011-10-25 13:42:50 <gavinandresen> ThomasV: not even close, sorry don't have time to debug hex txns....
 67 2011-10-25 13:43:01 <ThomasV> ok:-)
 68 2011-10-25 13:43:29 <gavinandresen> terrytibbs: 0.5 release the rename happened... some incompatibility with some qt thing
 69 2011-10-25 13:43:45 <ThomasV> gavinandresen: is there a debug tool that could help me ?
 70 2011-10-25 13:44:28 <terrytibbs> Gah. Makes my biznatch a whole lot more difficult. Guess I'll have to adapt
 71 2011-10-25 13:45:24 <gavinandresen> ThomasV: what are you trying to do?
 72 2011-10-25 13:45:42 <ThomasV> I'd like to know why it is not accepted by the network
 73 2011-10-25 13:47:47 <gavinandresen> ... and you created it how?
 74 2011-10-25 13:47:57 <ThomasV> myself, with a python script
 75 2011-10-25 13:48:11 <ThomasV> I am trying to write a thin client
 76 2011-10-25 13:49:22 <ThomasV> my script can verify the sig of existing valid transactions, but for some reason its own transactions seem to be invalid
 77 2011-10-25 13:49:23 <gavinandresen> So I'd fire up a bitcoind under gdb and then put a breakpoint where it checks transaction validation.  Or use one of the other up-and-coming implementations and but a breakpoint in their txn-validation code....
 78 2011-10-25 13:50:13 <ThomasV> ok, so in other words, there's no existing debug tool for that
 79 2011-10-25 13:50:15 <gavinandresen> I don't have any check-a-transaction-for-validity tools handy, maybe somebody else does
 80 2011-10-25 13:50:41 <ThomasV> ok
 81 2011-10-25 13:50:44 <casascius> i saw my name and "not cool"
 82 2011-10-25 13:52:17 <casascius> copumpkin: ??
 83 2011-10-25 13:54:33 <copumpkin> casascius: I just got an email from you ;)
 84 2011-10-25 13:54:55 <copumpkin> having never given you my email address...
 85 2011-10-25 13:55:09 <casascius> What did I purportedly say?
 86 2011-10-25 13:55:23 <copumpkin> an email address which is available in a public leak of mtgox user data :)
 87 2011-10-25 13:55:38 <casascius> I'm not in the midst of sending any e-mail so...
 88 2011-10-25 13:55:41 <copumpkin> http://snapplr.com/3z5k
 89 2011-10-25 13:55:43 <casascius> I'm interested to know
 90 2011-10-25 13:55:52 <copumpkin> maybe not you?
 91 2011-10-25 13:56:05 <casascius> Oh, someone has set up a phishing site.
 92 2011-10-25 13:56:19 <copumpkin> oh okay :)
 93 2011-10-25 13:56:36 <copumpkin> well then, let's replace the "not cool" to you, with "not cool" to them
 94 2011-10-25 13:57:49 <terrytibbs> Not cool
 95 2011-10-25 13:59:26 <terrytibbs> copumpkin: Are you the pumpkin i remember from iphone-dev?
 96 2011-10-25 13:59:35 <copumpkin> yep
 97 2011-10-25 13:59:49 <terrytibbs> neat
 98 2011-10-25 14:00:05 <ThomasV> no, he's an imposter!
 99 2011-10-25 14:00:13 <ThomasV> I am the pumpkin
100 2011-10-25 14:00:17 <copumpkin> lol
101 2011-10-25 14:00:24 <rjk2> no you are a train
102 2011-10-25 14:00:34 <ThomasV> that too
103 2011-10-25 14:02:21 <UukGoblin> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/24/ssl_dos_tool_released/
104 2011-10-25 14:07:12 <copumpkin> :o
105 2011-10-25 14:16:59 <rjk2> kool, i'm safe from the run-of-the-mill skript kiddies then
106 2011-10-25 14:17:22 <rjk2> although ones that can code can also cause chaos
107 2011-10-25 14:20:50 <UukGoblin> hrm
108 2011-10-25 14:20:54 <UukGoblin> ssl reneg is disabled here
109 2011-10-25 14:21:12 <UukGoblin> "ERROR: Target has disabled renegotiations.\n" "Use your own skills to modify the source to test/attack\n" "the target [hint: TCP reconnect for every handshake].\n"
110 2011-10-25 14:21:32 <UukGoblin> do you know if someone's already done that, or should I spend some time on it?