1 2012-03-03 00:15:00 <emukshi> dude are you serious
  2 2012-03-03 00:15:29 <emukshi> faflastafloon
  3 2012-03-03 00:15:36 <emukshi> haha
  4 2012-03-03 00:15:41 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
  5 2012-03-03 00:16:18 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
  6 2012-03-03 00:16:31 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
  7 2012-03-03 00:16:32 <emukshi> gmaxwell is a guy who spouts half-baked opinions on topics he doesn't understand like algorithmic complexity, etc. he applies a simple heuristic when he hears an idea - the more novel it seems to him, the more he resists. a lazy heuristic for a clueless, uneducated troll.
  8 2012-03-03 00:16:41 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
  9 2012-03-03 00:16:49 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
 10 2012-03-03 00:16:50 <emukshi> <gmaxwell> I can make k-sat problems that can be solve in polynomal time trivially  <-- lol, the guy has never heard of phase transitions in randomized k-sat. and he doesn't want to learn, because he's decided the topic is beyond his existing understanding. lol, it's basic theory.
 11 2012-03-03 00:16:53 <emukshi> gmaxwell is Gregory F. Maxwell, 13055 Laurel Tree Ln, Apt. 403, Herndon, VA 20171, 386-864-1817, gmaxwell@gmail.com // gratuitous neckbeard action: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gmaxwell-boat.jpg  // he's shacked up with kat walsh ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Kwalsh_5929_small.jpg )
 12 2012-03-03 00:17:25 <luke-jr> &
 13 2012-03-03 00:17:29 <zapati> well
 14 2012-03-03 00:17:49 <zapati> someone had to call gmaxwell out on his bullshit i guess
 15 2012-03-03 00:39:48 <gmaxwell_is_lazy> sup dawgs
 16 2012-03-03 00:39:51 <gmaxwell_is_lazy> man.. i guess ill start re-educating gmaxwell. trying to teach him that you can generate k-SAT problems of any desired difficulty. he seems to think there's no way to do it, since some instances are poly-time. he doesn't understand that the ratio of variables to clauses determines the difficulty factor.
 17 2012-03-03 00:39:52 <gmaxwell_is_lazy> http://toughsat.appspot.com/ - Welcome to ToughSAT. This site will generate boolean CNF formulas that encode "difficult" problems. For example, you can generate a boolean CNF formula whose satisfying assignment encodes non-trivial factors of an input number.
 18 2012-03-03 00:39:53 <gmaxwell_is_lazy> hahaaha
 19 2012-03-03 00:45:29 <copumpkin> what a ridiculous thing to get so upset about
 20 2012-03-03 00:48:26 <jrmithdobbs> just found a fun error
 21 2012-03-03 00:49:02 <jrmithdobbs> /Applications/Bitcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Bitcoin-Qt -rescan -noirc -nolisten -connect=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 22 2012-03-03 00:49:05 <jrmithdobbs> terminate called throwing an exceptionAbort trap: 6
 23 2012-03-03 00:51:51 <Joric> copumpkin, 'If it needs the key, the key must be stored on the server somewhere' - can be solved by long-term unlock from remote console eg. for 1 year but ofc it's not very handy
 24 2012-03-03 00:54:01 <Joric> depends on uptime )
 25 2012-03-03 00:54:05 <theboxen> at least one device that authorizes the transactions has to be under your physical control
 26 2012-03-03 01:00:31 <jrmithdobbs> also why are dnsseeds getting polled with -noirc -nolisten -connect= ?!
 27 2012-03-03 01:01:23 <shangaroo> yes we are all bored of gmaxwell's non-stop trolling and technical incompetence. he is parked on irc and is a fountain of spurious comments. i don't know anyone who can take him half-way seriously.
 28 2012-03-03 01:01:24 <shangaroo> Difficulty of solving 3-SAT problem as function of clause/variable ratio: http://www.isi.edu/~szekely/antsebook/ebook/institutions/altarum/images/3sathardness.gif
 29 2012-03-03 01:01:55 <shangaroo> the point being to spur the development of super-fast solvers. which people will do when theres a financial incentive to build awesome miners. those same solvers can be used for a zillion optimizations in industry from chip design to routing optimization
 30 2012-03-03 01:02:10 <shangaroo> gmaxwell = barnacle on the bitcoin ship
 31 2012-03-03 01:06:49 <jrmithdobbs> gmaxwell: i thought you said blockchain download had gotten much faster?
 32 2012-03-03 01:12:12 <jrmithdobbs> the address book dialog from the sign message dialog is (very confusing to be 3 dialogs deep ugh) fubar on os x, can't read half the buttons at the bottom on english trans at least
 33 2012-03-03 01:12:22 <jrmithdobbs> pictures are fucked up next to the buttons too
 34 2012-03-03 01:12:49 <jrmithdobbs> (rc2)
 35 2012-03-03 01:25:08 <hebulurg> "A seminal paper by Selman, Mitchell and Levesque considered the empirical performance of DPLL-type solvers running on uniform-random-SAT instances. It found a strong correlation between the instance's hardness and the ratio of the number of clauses to the number of variables in the instance... This well-publicized finding led to increased enthusiasm for the idea of studying algorithm
 36 2012-03-03 01:25:29 <hebulurg> http://robotics.stanford.edu/~shoham/www%20papers/CP04randomsat.pdf good background on it
 37 2012-03-03 01:30:42 <jrmithdobbs> gmaxwell: wow this is still catching up 40 minutes later :(
 38 2012-03-03 01:31:25 <gmaxwell> jrmithdobbs: it's still slow unless you're on something that ignores fsync, e.g. tmpfs.
 39 2012-03-03 01:32:22 <jrmithdobbs> gmaxwell: this is going to an ssd
 40 2012-03-03 01:32:46 <gmaxwell> jrmithdobbs: doesn't matter much (and heck. a lot of SSDs have rather slow writes)
 41 2012-03-03 01:33:00 <jrmithdobbs> but ya, it's going through two layers of hfs+ with that fsync because disk image
 42 2012-03-03 01:33:14 <gmaxwell> well there you go
 43 2012-03-03 01:36:48 <hebulurg> lol blockchain slowness is another area of gmaxwell fail. his dumbass solution is for evryone to run on tmpfs. good call jackass. most users don't want to fucking create new partitions just to buy some alpaca socks. gmaxwell's obstinate fails / and ridiculous chinstrap / hidebound reactionary-ness is holding back bitcoin discussions. he's one of those toxic people who are a net negative
 44 2012-03-03 01:36:50 <hebulurg> ahoooooba
 45 2012-03-03 01:37:25 <theboxen> horse has left the barn
 46 2012-03-03 01:49:11 <glamer> duuuuuuuuuuuude
 47 2012-03-03 01:49:15 <glamer> shit gmaxwell says: "lpdaskain: controlling the difficulty of those problems is hard"  what scientists say: there is "a strong correlation between the instance's hardness and the ratio of the number of clauses to the number of variables in the instance..." a "well-publicized finding." who's right? chinstrap or basic cs theory? you be the judge.
 48 2012-03-03 02:03:35 <denisx> gmaxwell: did you confuse him with facts? ;)
 49 2012-03-03 02:05:28 <gmaxwell> denisx: nah. There wasn't even a discussion really I banned him as soon as I realized he was $thatguy.
 50 2012-03-03 02:06:01 <jiglio> lol lmao. gmaxwell is playing the victim. "<gmaxwell> he mostly just tries to pick technical arguments with people" baahhaha. no one ever solicited your view or argument on anything gmaxwell, because your feedback is worthless. you've been proved wrong time and time again, but you persist in spreading misinformation and refuse to learn basic concepts. "picking a fight" suggests someone
 51 2012-03-03 05:33:00 <Graet> http://blockchain.info/block-index/187066/0000000000000112732b58edbea62a487254fece5df9d1ee564fc3ca17f4507f  p2p pool and "strange" ntransactions
 52 2012-03-03 05:35:11 <luke-jr> Graet: you can spend the 0-amount one!
 53 2012-03-03 05:35:44 <Graet> ty luke-jr :)
 54 2012-03-03 05:58:48 <DrHaribo> Wow, one guy was talking to himself here all night?
 55 2012-03-03 07:04:58 <denisx> lolz, some botnet is acknowledging my fast pool with 75GH/s from cpus
 56 2012-03-03 07:09:00 <copumpkin> "Last received block was received %n second ago"
 57 2012-03-03 07:09:05 <copumpkin> in bitcoin-qt
 58 2012-03-03 07:11:22 <gmaxwell> copumpkin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/874
 59 2012-03-03 07:12:12 <copumpkin> where did the (s) go in the message I'm seeing?
 60 2012-03-03 11:03:42 <nathan7> nanotube: gribble doesn't auto-op anymore?
 61 2012-03-03 11:16:09 <denisx> this botnet is huge, I need more than 250k firewall states and more than 150k openfiles
 62 2012-03-03 11:20:39 <sipa> to do what?
 63 2012-03-03 11:22:40 <denisx> to cpu mine on my pool
 64 2012-03-03 11:22:57 <denisx> I mean to serve the botnet
 65 2012-03-03 11:28:12 <denisx> and one pool must have lost 150GH/s because this guy didn't come from nowhere
 66 2012-03-03 11:29:08 <nathan7> lol
 67 2012-03-03 11:30:25 <[Tycho]> What guy ?
 68 2012-03-03 11:30:35 <denisx> a botnet owner
 69 2012-03-03 11:30:44 <[Tycho]> 150 GH/s sounds like GPUMAX
 70 2012-03-03 11:31:06 <[Tycho]> I wonder where you can find a 150 GH/s botnet.
 71 2012-03-03 11:31:10 <denisx> no, this is CPU based
 72 2012-03-03 11:31:17 <denisx> it is hitting me with 3000 getworks/sec
 73 2012-03-03 11:31:22 <[Tycho]> Cool.
 74 2012-03-03 11:31:30 <nathan7> o.o
 75 2012-03-03 11:31:38 <[Tycho]> Your software should be really effective.
 76 2012-03-03 11:31:47 <nathan7> that's.. impressive
 77 2012-03-03 11:31:54 <denisx> I use pushpoold
 78 2012-03-03 11:32:04 <denisx> modified ;)
 79 2012-03-03 11:32:45 <[Tycho]> How many percents of CPU load you have at that rate ?
 80 2012-03-03 11:33:20 <denisx> my load is around 0.8
 81 2012-03-03 11:33:45 <sipa> [Tycho]: any news about how fast you could deploy BIP30?
 82 2012-03-03 11:33:55 <[Tycho]> What is BIP30 ?
 83 2012-03-03 11:34:00 <[Tycho]> That double-coinbase thing ?
 84 2012-03-03 11:34:07 <sipa> Yes.
 85 2012-03-03 11:34:29 <sipa> Not only coinbases, actually.
 86 2012-03-03 11:34:29 <[Tycho]> Yesterday I asked about proposed deadline here but no one answered.
 87 2012-03-03 11:35:18 <sipa> I answered that I was just exploring what timeframe was reasonable for pools.
 88 2012-03-03 11:36:06 <[Tycho]> I think it may be the same as for BIP16. Or so we need more prompt action ?
 89 2012-03-03 11:36:17 <[Tycho]> *do
 90 2012-03-03 11:36:28 <justmoon> BIP16 is a feature, BIP30 is a security bugfix
 91 2012-03-03 11:36:49 <[Tycho]> I mean that I can deploy both at same time.
 92 2012-03-03 11:37:11 <[Tycho]> If its a fix, then why do you call it "BIP" ?
 93 2012-03-03 11:37:12 <sipa> I was hoping for something like "it will take me a few days"
 94 2012-03-03 11:37:34 <sipa> because it is a change to the network rulea
 95 2012-03-03 11:37:52 <sipa> and we need absolute consensus about it
 96 2012-03-03 11:37:54 <[Tycho]> I'm planning to do something before 15.03.2012
 97 2012-03-03 11:38:19 <sipa> So march 15 would be doable?
 98 2012-03-03 11:39:07 <[Tycho]> At least that's what I have in my todo list.
 99 2012-03-03 11:39:14 <denisx> how big is the change?
100 2012-03-03 11:39:25 <[Tycho]> What is the date in the unix time shown there ?
101 2012-03-03 11:40:07 <[Tycho]> denisx: about 5 lines
102 2012-03-03 11:40:35 <sipa> [Tycho]: no idea, it was just an example, the actual patch will be published when a day is decided
103 2012-03-03 11:40:36 <[Tycho]> I don't have anything against this fix.
104 2012-03-03 11:40:53 <sipa> denisx: you operate a pool? which one?
105 2012-03-03 11:41:00 <denisx> btcmp.com
106 2012-03-03 11:41:08 <[Tycho]> If it's not only for coinbases - what else is affected ?
107 2012-03-03 11:41:10 <denisx> very small
108 2012-03-03 11:41:38 <[Tycho]> If you can sustain 3000 gw/s it's pretty good.
109 2012-03-03 11:42:00 <sipa> [Tycho]: i linked to roconnor's blog where the attack is ezplained
110 2012-03-03 11:42:12 <[Tycho]> sipa: where ?
111 2012-03-03 11:42:36 <sipa> in my mail where i asked for pool'd support
112 2012-03-03 11:43:12 <[Tycho]> I didn't knew it was you.
113 2012-03-03 11:43:20 <[Tycho]> Only real name was stated.
114 2012-03-03 11:43:21 <sipa> here it is: http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html
115 2012-03-03 11:43:43 <sipa> Ok, I am Pieter.
116 2012-03-03 11:43:52 <[Tycho]> Yes, now I see it.
117 2012-03-03 11:44:06 <[Tycho]> I was wondering who it was :)
118 2012-03-03 11:45:09 <sipa> On most placed I switched to using my real name, but IRC remains IRC :)
119 2012-03-03 11:45:25 <[Tycho]> What is Midas Money ?
120 2012-03-03 11:45:41 <sipa> A pseudonym for Bitcoin.
121 2012-03-03 11:45:58 <sipa> He likes to be cryptical, it seems.
122 2012-03-03 11:47:45 <sipa> In short: with some mining power he can revert transactions, but never more than what the attacker lost in mining income, and he could force block chain splits.
123 2012-03-03 11:49:07 <[Tycho]> Ok.
124 2012-03-03 11:49:42 <[Tycho]> Currently I'm targeting for 15.03 unless someone have any objections.
125 2012-03-03 11:50:29 <sipa> I'll ask around whether march 15 is reasonable for other pools as well.
126 2012-03-03 11:50:42 <sipa> Thanks.
127 2012-03-03 11:52:29 <denisx> this was the deepbit owner, right?
128 2012-03-03 12:02:10 <sipa> denisx: yes
129 2012-03-03 14:36:28 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: speakingof crypto failure due to improper key storage (and it sounds like improper key use in general ...)
130 2012-03-03 14:36:32 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: http://www.pcworld.com/article/251187/hackers_elect_futuramas_bender_to_the_washington_dc_school_board.html
131 2012-03-03 14:36:35 <jrmithdobbs> lol
132 2012-03-03 14:39:08 <gavinandresen> I'm sure Bender will do an excellent job.
133 2012-03-03 14:39:26 <gavinandresen> KISS MY SHINY METAL ASS!!!
134 2012-03-03 14:40:19 <jrmithdobbs> best part is how it took them two days to notice
135 2012-03-03 14:41:40 <gavinandresen> jrmithdobbs: RE: /Applications/Bitcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Bitcoin-Qt -rescan ... etc
136 2012-03-03 14:41:59 <gavinandresen> I don't think there's anything we can do about launching bitcoin that way not working.
137 2012-03-03 14:42:15 <gavinandresen> Use:  open Bitcoin-Qt.app --args -resacan ... blah blah
138 2012-03-03 14:43:24 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: oh, didn't followup because noone was around, launching it that way works fine, had to launch it that way to get the error message in that case
139 2012-03-03 14:44:00 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: i have ~/Library/Application Support/Bitcoin as a symlink to a dir that only exists when another volume is mounted
140 2012-03-03 14:44:15 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: so it gives that weird error when trying to use homedir
141 2012-03-03 14:45:30 <jrmithdobbs> get similar with bitcoind just doing ln -s /non-existstant/path/here ~/.bitcoin
142 2012-03-03 14:45:35 <gavinandresen> jrmithdobbs: huh. I could've sworn launching/gdb'ing directly into the Contents/MacOs didn't work properly
143 2012-03-03 14:46:31 <jrmithdobbs> works fine, but I do usually launch with open /Applications/Bitcoin-Qt.app --args <stuff>
144 2012-03-03 14:47:25 <jrmithdobbs> specifically: /usr/bin/open /Applications/Bitcoin-Qt.app --args -rescan -noirc -nolisten -connect=
145 2012-03-03 14:54:40 <sipa> gavinandresen: i've got replies for around 55% percent support for BIP30, and deepbit intends to implement before march 15
146 2012-03-03 14:54:45 <jrmithdobbs> tbqh, out of what i mentioned the only one that matters is that dns seeds get queried even with -connect=, seems like unnecessary privacy/dns leakage considering that -connect= could be a private ip
147 2012-03-03 14:54:58 <gavinandresen> sipa: Great, March 15 it is, then
148 2012-03-03 14:55:08 <jrmithdobbs> especially since the seeds are then never used
149 2012-03-03 14:55:42 <gavinandresen> jrmithdobbs: that should be an easy fix, just a SoftSetArg(-dns, false) if -connect is given
150 2012-03-03 14:55:49 <gavinandresen> err. -dnsseed false
151 2012-03-03 14:56:00 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: yup
152 2012-03-03 14:59:07 <sipa> gavinandresen: any idea where to find "0.3.24 + vinced patches" ?
153 2012-03-03 15:01:06 <gavinandresen> sipa:  https://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/tree/p2sh_backport_vinced  minus a few commits would be a good place to start
154 2012-03-03 15:01:52 <gavinandresen> I think vinced has a github account, I started at commit ddca550f5a
155 2012-03-03 15:02:19 <sipa> i only see a namecoin repository of his
156 2012-03-03 15:02:45 <gavinandresen> ... although I bet your patch is simple enough in a part of the code that doesn't change much that a 0.3.19 patch would apply to pretty much everything cleanly.
157 2012-03-03 15:03:31 <sipa> it should, but i think pools will have even less problems if there is a patch marked "for 0.3.24 + vinced"
158 2012-03-03 15:09:33 <jrmithdobbs> gavinandresen: simple enough. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/914
159 2012-03-03 15:10:07 <gribble> New news from bitcoinrss: jrmithdobbs opened pull request 914 on bitcoin/bitcoin <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/914>
160 2012-03-03 15:15:09 <gribble> New news from bitcoinrss: sipa opened pull request 915 on bitcoin/bitcoin <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/915>
161 2012-03-03 16:01:56 <luke-jr> sipa: is there a reason BIP 30 isn't merged to mainline?
162 2012-03-03 16:02:10 <sipa> luke-jr: it will be soon
163 2012-03-03 16:02:17 <sipa> gavin just commented
164 2012-03-03 16:41:54 <gavinandresen> merged nooverwritetx
165 2012-03-03 16:43:51 <luke-jr> gavinandresen: thanks
166 2012-03-03 16:46:30 <sipa> luke-jr: will eligius implement it as well?
167 2012-03-03 16:46:41 <luke-jr> sipa: of course
168 2012-03-03 16:47:01 <sipa> (i assumed so, but never saw you confirming it; good)
169 2012-03-03 16:48:03 <luke-jr> sipa: are the backports intentionally different from master?
170 2012-03-03 16:48:27 <luke-jr> -+    if (pindex->nTime > 1331769600 || (fTestNet && pindex->nTime > 1329696000))
171 2012-03-03 16:48:29 <luke-jr> ++    if (pindex->nTime > 1331769600)
172 2012-03-03 16:48:48 <luke-jr> plus some comment differences
173 2012-03-03 16:49:10 <sipa> the backports don't have the testnet update yet; i'm updating them as well now
174 2012-03-03 16:49:25 <luke-jr> ok
175 2012-03-03 16:49:51 <luke-jr> sipa: ping me when 0.4.0 backport is ready for merging to stable, please
176 2012-03-03 16:50:11 <sipa> one minute
177 2012-03-03 16:55:18 <sipa> luke-jr: done
178 2012-03-03 16:56:56 <DrHaribo> should the testnet really have a difficulty below 1?
179 2012-03-03 16:58:54 <luke-jr> DrHaribo: why not?
180 2012-03-03 16:59:24 <DrHaribo> The wiki says the minimum difficulty is 1
181 2012-03-03 16:59:36 <luke-jr> DrHaribo: for bitcoin mainnet
182 2012-03-03 16:59:47 <DrHaribo> Also, bitcoind reports a difficulty of 7.26984055 although bits and target show the actual difficulty is below 1
183 2012-03-03 17:00:00 <luke-jr> O.o
184 2012-03-03 17:00:25 <DrHaribo> At least I think "bitcoind getdifficulty" should not lie :P
185 2012-03-03 17:00:33 <sipa> DrHaribo: bitcoind reports the difficulty of the last block
186 2012-03-03 17:00:53 <luke-jr> sipa: c4341fa Add mruset and use it for setInventoryKnown
187 2012-03-03 17:00:58 <sipa> since the last testnet diificulty policy change, that may differ significantly from the difficulty reported by getwork/getmemorypool
188 2012-03-03 17:01:01 <luke-jr> sipa: does this fix a bug?
189 2012-03-03 17:01:12 <sipa> luke-jr: yes, exploitable dos attack
190 2012-03-03 17:01:53 <luke-jr> sipa: is it like the automatic DoS banning introduced in 0.5, or more like a buffer overflow?
191 2012-03-03 17:02:13 <DrHaribo> ok, thanks for explaining
192 2012-03-03 17:02:18 <sipa> luke-jr: an attacker with a p2p connection to you can cause unlimited memory usage for your node
193 2012-03-03 17:02:25 <luke-jr> hmm
194 2012-03-03 17:02:39 <sipa> while avoiding the existing dos protection
195 2012-03-03 17:02:41 <luke-jr> sipa: so IYO, it should get merged to stable? now or eventually?
196 2012-03-03 17:03:11 <sipa> eventually, but maybe wait after a mainline rc contains it
197 2012-03-03 17:03:18 <luke-jr> k
198 2012-03-03 17:04:03 <luke-jr> sipa: what say ye about a06113b Workaround for BN_bn2mpi reading/writing out of bounds?
199 2012-03-03 17:04:51 <sipa> luke-jr: won't hurt, and probably doesn't fix anything either
200 2012-03-03 17:06:14 <luke-jr> k
201 2012-03-03 17:06:21 <luke-jr> wumpus: reping
202 2012-03-03 18:04:26 <luke-jr> tagged & bitcoind 0.4.4rc3, 0.5.0.4rc3, and 0.5.3rc3 | Bitcoin-Qt 0.5.0.4rc3 and 0.5.3rc3
203 2012-03-03 23:15:28 <Diablo-D3> gmaxwell: well, this is fucked
204 2012-03-03 23:15:37 <Diablo-D3> I have been having predictinator spit out past predictions
205 2012-03-03 23:15:43 <Diablo-D3> going back 30 months at a time
206 2012-03-03 23:15:50 <Diablo-D3> its about 90% accurate about the what
207 2012-03-03 23:15:57 <Diablo-D3> its been about 10% accurate about the when
208 2012-03-03 23:19:49 <nanotube> nathan7: yea but you have +o with chanserv if you need it.
209 2012-03-03 23:21:42 <nathan7> nanotube: oic
210 2012-03-03 23:39:03 <nathan7> well, well, well
211 2012-03-03 23:39:50 <nathan7> I finally want to spend my coins and I'm 0.85BTC short
212 2012-03-03 23:40:04 <nathan7> oh well