1 2014-05-17 04:28:35 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
2 2014-05-17 04:28:53 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
3 2014-05-17 04:28:54 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
4 2014-05-17 04:29:09 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
5 2014-05-17 04:29:10 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
6 2014-05-17 04:29:10 <coo-coo-pigeon> v
7 2014-05-17 04:29:11 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
8 2014-05-17 04:29:12 <coo-coo-pigeon> Poopy ass toilet crap shit turd balls penis fuck bitch doosh anus holy bullshit dick pussy gay son of a boner hell
9 2014-05-17 04:29:12 <coo-coo-pigeon> v
10 2014-05-17 04:41:51 <fanquake> someoneweird gmaxwell ^
11 2014-05-17 06:37:32 <warren> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4189
12 2014-05-17 06:37:41 <warren> can someone please test the determinism of this?
13 2014-05-17 09:32:50 <dabura667> Question about BIP38 to anyone who can answer: I am trying to understand what becomes possible with EC-multiply and without it. It says it uses intermediary code to generate an address... but can't you just have the client's browser generate a new privkey and pubkey, encrypt privkey without EC, and send only the encrypted privkey and the resulting pubkey to the server? What becomes possible that is in no way possible without i
14 2014-05-17 09:32:50 <dabura667> t?
15 2014-05-17 09:34:03 <dabura667> (my friend wants to make a service that prints up plastic bitcoin cards for users and is looking to do what I explained above. He got confused with all the info on EC multiplying, and asked me if he needed to be using that.)
16 2014-05-17 09:38:32 <dzan> hi, I have the bitcoin daemon running with this config: http://paste.debian.net/100117/ & my netstat says:
17 2014-05-17 09:38:36 <dzan> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8332 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1000 63553 2702/dogecoin-qt
18 2014-05-17 09:38:39 <dzan> tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:44556 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1000 63543 2702/dogecoin-qt
19 2014-05-17 09:38:42 <dzan> tcp6 0 0 ::1:8332 :::* LISTEN 1000 63552 2702/dogecoin-qt
20 2014-05-17 09:38:45 <dzan> and one more for ip6
21 2014-05-17 09:39:33 <dzan> dogecoind -rpcpassword=xxxx -rpcport=8332 getbalance
22 2014-05-17 09:39:33 <dzan> still I get this:
23 2014-05-17 09:39:34 <dzan> error: no response from server
24 2014-05-17 09:39:46 <dzan> any ideas? i really don't get it
25 2014-05-17 09:40:21 <dzan> when I try a faulty port I get 'couldn't connect to server' so it does detect the server
26 2014-05-17 09:47:27 <FManTropyx> dogecoind?
27 2014-05-17 09:48:43 <FManTropyx> try without the rpc options, just "bitcoind getbalance"
28 2014-05-17 10:06:24 <warren> not good
29 2014-05-17 10:06:31 <warren> #4189 is non-deterministic
30 2014-05-17 10:06:42 <warren> it even randomly gets stuck in a configure loop
31 2014-05-17 10:06:46 <warren> only sometimes
32 2014-05-17 10:06:51 <phantomcircuit> ha
33 2014-05-17 10:25:47 <dzan> FManTropyx: yes but the rpc should be identical
34 2014-05-17 10:26:35 <dzan> FManTropyx: same, no response from server
35 2014-05-17 10:29:57 <FManTropyx> then I don't know, hopefully someone can help you
36 2014-05-17 10:35:10 <warren> coryfields: it seems determinism is broken by other things in the build filesystem
37 2014-05-17 10:35:27 <warren> unclear if that's connected to the intermittent perpetual configure loop
38 2014-05-17 11:20:54 <dzan> anyone here has a working setup; bitcoind replying to rpc calls locally?
39 2014-05-17 11:25:47 <warren> dzan: you already made it clear that you are working with dogecoin, not bitcoin, making your question off-topic for this channel as we do not do alt coin support.
40 2014-05-17 11:26:07 <warren> dzan: additionally you're asking a user support question that is covered in documentation
41 2014-05-17 11:26:18 <warren> user support doesn't belong here either
42 2014-05-17 11:42:04 <dzan> warren: ok i went over the documentation and didn't find it
43 2014-05-17 11:42:49 <dzan> warren: I think you know as well as i do that if I want an answer I don't have to try asking in #bitcoin or #dogecoin
44 2014-05-17 11:43:10 <dzan> warren: also check the dogecoin / bitcoin git diff, this part should be exactly the same
45 2014-05-17 11:44:01 <dzan> also you seem to indicate my question is in the docs, i didn't see it if you just know what term to look for I don't see why you wouldn't just point me to it, small effort for you big help for me
46 2014-05-17 11:44:15 <dzan> but fine, I won't ask anymore
47 2014-05-17 13:22:36 <chichov> hey, anybody knows in which field the "DOS/STONED" string was programmed into in a transaction?
48 2014-05-17 14:15:23 <Burrito> chichov, Probably OP_RETURN? I don't know, but it wouldn't matter, as long as an AV scanner is able to pick up the signature.
49 2014-05-17 15:12:46 <chichov> Burrito: it matters to me, because I'm investigating malleability issues in transactions
50 2014-05-17 15:14:03 <gmaxwell> chichov: then it doubly shouldn't matter to you
51 2014-05-17 15:14:12 <gmaxwell> because it has absolutely nothing to do with malleability.
52 2014-05-17 15:16:17 <chichov> gmaxwell: well yes, in the context of signature malleability
53 2014-05-17 15:16:51 <chichov> nevertheless, it is odd that news services state that the virus signature was put into a "comments" field in transactions
54 2014-05-17 15:17:05 <gmaxwell> There is no comments field in transactions.
55 2014-05-17 15:17:11 <chichov> exactly
56 2014-05-17 15:17:24 <gmaxwell> they're just, like many other people, confused by blockchain.info
57 2014-05-17 15:17:58 <gmaxwell> at least some of these things (the ones I looked at) were done just by casting things into hash160s.
58 2014-05-17 15:18:13 <gmaxwell> Burrito: op_return will very specifically not trigger these warnings.
59 2014-05-17 15:18:24 <Burrito> ah
60 2014-05-17 15:18:29 <gmaxwell> some of this idiot av software has signature strings as short as 16 bytes.
61 2014-05-17 15:18:35 <chichov> for example here http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Virenscanner-warnt-vor-Bitcoin-Blockchain-2192407.html they say that "According to a discussion in the microsoft community a few characters long signature of the virus is put in a field that bitcoin users use to comment their transactions"
62 2014-05-17 15:18:39 <gmaxwell> they all also ignore files >32 mbytes.
63 2014-05-17 15:18:44 <Burrito> fail.
64 2014-05-17 15:18:56 <gmaxwell> chichov: so, thats what you get by reading the mass media.
65 2014-05-17 15:18:58 <Burrito> gmaxwell, so op_return stuff doesn't make it to the chainstate?
66 2014-05-17 15:19:26 <chichov> gmaxwell: indeed, mass confusion
67 2014-05-17 15:19:41 <chichov> I'm aware that there is no field like that, but I was still curious to know where they put the data
68 2014-05-17 15:19:43 <gmaxwell> Burrito: correct.
69 2014-05-17 15:19:55 <chichov> most likely just an unspendable address
70 2014-05-17 15:20:23 <gmaxwell> chichov: as I said, they're just encoding it as a hash160 in the examples I've seen. This only works for a signture of 160 bits.. but some of them are as short at 16 bytes.
71 2014-05-17 15:21:20 <chichov> you mean they put it in the pubkey field?
72 2014-05-17 15:22:35 <gmaxwell> there is no "pubkey field". I already gave you a more specific answer, so I can't tell for sure what you're asking there.
73 2014-05-17 15:23:00 <chichov> I mean the scriptPubkey field in the transaction output
74 2014-05-17 15:23:33 <chichov> where you can put a hash160 as part of a P2PubkeyHash transaction
75 2014-05-17 15:23:59 <gmaxwell> sure
76 2014-05-17 15:24:17 <chichov> was wondering if that's the field you were talking about
77 2014-05-17 17:52:06 <dexX7> my debug.log is filled with countless "receive version message" from localhost and a specific peer: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=7uCN10Cw ... is there an error on my side, something nefarious or nothing special at all?
78 2014-05-17 18:28:23 <Burrito> hmm, the ports are all different
79 2014-05-17 18:32:57 <Burrito> it must be reconnecting the whole time?
80 2014-05-17 18:38:04 <Skirmant> hi, in which file are the block reward parameters stored in?
81 2014-05-17 18:44:39 <Skirmant> nvm, found it!
82 2014-05-17 18:56:51 <anton000> anyone got some material / notes on how side chain will be implemented ?
83 2014-05-17 18:58:02 <dexX7> Burrito: yup, looks like someone is reconnecting the whole time, but i'm also wondering, because usually my external ip is shown for "us" and their ip for "them", but not 127.0.0.1. this still keeps going on, maybe some kind of dos attempt? more than 3000 such requests over the last hour
84 2014-05-17 18:59:16 <Burrito> dexX7, I see no real harm in blocking them, if that's possible.
85 2014-05-17 19:00:31 <dexX7> alright :)
86 2014-05-17 19:05:20 <Burrito> dexX7, do you happen to be running 0.8.6?
87 2014-05-17 19:05:41 <dexX7> earlier, yes. but currently 0.9x
88 2014-05-17 19:06:11 <Burrito> ah
89 2014-05-17 19:48:10 <michagogo> warren: I am now, though only for a bit and not at my computer
90 2014-05-17 20:21:02 <chichov> Evening everyone. I'd like to subtly advertise a description of the bitcoin protocol I've written under http://enetium.com/resources/Bitcoin.pdf
91 2014-05-17 20:22:03 <chichov> I'd greatly appreciate it if any of you experts could take a look at it and provide me with some feedback
92 2014-05-17 20:42:00 <crunk-juice> hey all
93 2014-05-17 20:42:22 <crunk-juice> anyone know a place I can get addresses of some testnet nodes?
94 2014-05-17 20:43:49 <Kabosu> Blockexplorer.com's testnet node is always up.
95 2014-05-17 20:44:05 <Kabosu> ACTION hugs crunk-juice
96 2014-05-17 20:45:50 <crunk-juice> What's the address on that one?
97 2014-05-17 20:45:52 <crunk-juice> and port
98 2014-05-17 20:45:55 <crunk-juice> or am I just missing it
99 2014-05-17 20:46:36 <michagogo> crunk-juice: 5.9.140.23 and 2a01:4f8:190:1405:beef:: should be up on testnet