1 2014-07-22 02:46:05 <skinnkavaj> SunnyKing a legend  http://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/the-real-sunny
 2 2014-07-22 04:26:37 <bombsite> Hi Greg, if a BIP doesn't have a link on the number, does that mean the proposal is still incomplete? private??
 3 2014-07-22 04:36:41 <gmaxwell> bombsite: What BIP are you referring to?
 4 2014-07-22 04:37:52 <bombsite> 40,41,63 https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
 5 2014-07-22 04:38:25 <bombsite> sorry, I'm just reading as much as I can, I'm pretty noob so I probably won't be able to contribute much besides some optimizations/refactoring...
 6 2014-07-22 04:39:27 <gmaxwell> bombsite: 40, 41, don't exist— they asked for numbers to be allocated and I allocated them but they never wrote them.
 7 2014-07-22 04:39:33 <gmaxwell> (a mistake I won't make in the future)
 8 2014-07-22 04:39:56 <gmaxwell> 63 had a draft but it was off being reworked.
 9 2014-07-22 04:41:30 <bombsite> I see, do you have any ideas for what someone should do if they want integration to possibly help out in the future? Any parts of the code or wikis to read?
10 2014-07-22 05:43:18 <fr0x> hey guys, I am rather new to the bitcoin api as a whole. This link here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Original_Bitcoin_client/API_calls_list ... are the 'commands' able to be attached to some sort of GET parameter or how can I use them?
11 2014-07-22 05:43:39 <fr0x> Is it possible to use with C++ or Java?
12 2014-07-22 05:47:08 <fr0x> guys?
13 2014-07-22 05:48:43 <Luke-Jr> fr0x: it's standard JSON-RPC
14 2014-07-22 06:03:05 <wumpus> the point of the RPC interface is that it can be used from any language
15 2014-07-22 06:18:56 <wumpus> cronus: FYI I just tested src/bitcoin-cli -testnet  importaddress mvqaxopu9Uef2qjXSV3fGrp6DcEYnCoYWK "" false    and it ran without rescan
16 2014-07-22 06:39:30 <venzen> in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script it says scriptSig is in the input of the spending transaction and scriptPubKey is in the output of the previously unspent i.e. "available" transaction.
17 2014-07-22 06:40:42 <venzen> looking at a transaction it appears that scriptPubKey is in the output(s) of the current transaction... what am i missing?
18 2014-07-22 06:43:03 <venzen> the previous transaction (input to current transaction) lists scriptSig with <sig> <pubKey>, so I'm having difficulty understanding why scriptPubKey (as described in the wiki) is also being fetched from the previous transaction.
19 2014-07-22 06:43:11 <poutine> venzen, for a txout to be spent, the scriptPubKey of the txout is prepended to the scriptSig, and must evaluate to TRUE
20 2014-07-22 06:44:14 <poutine> See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transactions#Types_of_Transaction for some technical details
21 2014-07-22 06:44:21 <venzen> thank poutine. How does this relate to the scriptPubKey listed under each of the current transaction's outputs?
22 2014-07-22 06:44:31 <venzen> is it the same thing?
23 2014-07-22 06:47:27 <venzen> i get this much: there is the stack. prev_out tx scriptSig <sig> and <pubKey> go on the stack. Then scriptPubKey's script operations (OP_DUP, etc) use that to arrive at True or False
24 2014-07-22 06:48:54 <venzen> Is the scriptPubkey OPs we are refering those listed under the current tx's outputs or are we refering to scriptPubKey of the prev_out (now an input to the current tx) ?
25 2014-07-22 06:51:13 <poutine> the scriptPubKey belongs to the txout you're spending, the scriptSig belongs to the txin in the spending transaction
26 2014-07-22 07:03:48 <venzen> jeez, i wish i was much cleverer. Thanks poutine. So is anything being referenced that's not listed in the output of this example transaction?
27 2014-07-22 07:04:32 <venzen> http://blockexplorer.com/rawtx/90b18aa54288ec610d83ff1abe90f10d8ca87fb6411a72b2e56a169fdc9b0219