1 2014-09-22 01:27:08 <alfacent2> Regarding the Free lottery I think twitter could be used as a third party to avoid that miners could discard blocks to manipulate the results. The random number just needs to be affected by a twitter-ID generated afterwards. Bitmillions uses Twitter as a third party for a bitcoin lottery and it seems it works fine. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BitMillions
 2 2014-09-22 03:36:12 <remotemass> sipa: are you around?
 3 2014-09-22 04:13:38 <sipa> remotemass: yes
 4 2014-09-22 04:20:15 <remotemass> sipa: I would love to hear from you regarding my post on the technical board. Your feedback is very important to me
 5 2014-09-22 04:20:32 <remotemass> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=790883.0
 6 2014-09-22 04:21:38 <sipa> remotemass: i believe andytoshi addresses the problems very well
 7 2014-09-22 04:23:06 <andytoshi> remotemass: one thing i should've emphasized more is that it's possible to do this without forking, so technical problems not withstanding this idea is simply a nonstarter. we can discuss in #bitcoin if you like
 8 2014-09-22 04:25:58 <remotemass> andytoshi, I don't understand why you say I'm using the fees semantics
 9 2014-09-22 04:26:50 <andytoshi> remotemass: ask in #bitcoin, please, this is a logged development channel
10 2014-09-22 04:26:58 <remotemass> For enforcing new protocol rules you would need a fork, not?
11 2014-09-22 04:27:13 <remotemass> Ok, was just because I wanted sipa feedback
12 2014-09-22 04:38:29 <justanotheruser> remotemass: did you PM me?
13 2014-09-22 05:13:14 <Luke-Jr> remotemass: +2 on andytoshi's response
14 2014-09-22 05:29:46 <remotemass> Luke-Jr, ok
15 2014-09-22 07:10:48 <Luke-Jr> sipa: yes
16 2014-09-22 07:14:54 <sipa> Luke-Jr: to what question?