1 2014-11-08 01:04:22 <sipa> cfields: i can do -j20 on my laptop :)
 2 2014-11-08 01:04:39 <cfields> brag :)
 3 2014-11-08 01:06:21 <cfields> i've benched it a few times. on my machine (oldish quad sandy-bridge i7), -j8 tends to be the quickest
 4 2014-11-08 01:57:38 <earlz> So, what is the reasoning for not allowing non-final transactions into blocks?
 5 2014-11-08 01:58:26 <kindoge> it might be more "why allow them into blocks when they aren't spendable"
 6 2014-11-08 01:58:40 <earlz> But they will eventually be spendable, so what's the harm?
 7 2014-11-08 01:59:30 <kindoge> yeah, but they're not
 8 2014-11-08 01:59:33 <kindoge> anyone can ignore nlocktime
 9 2014-11-08 01:59:45 <earlz> what?
10 2014-11-08 01:59:48 <kindoge> nevermind
11 2014-11-08 01:59:51 <kindoge> different thing :P
12 2014-11-08 02:00:59 <earlz> I remember seeing some documentation abotu why it was chosen (and I think in bitcoin 0.3 and less, or some really early version, it was allowed)
13 2014-11-08 02:02:06 <earlz> can't remember what it was
14 2014-11-08 02:11:27 <sinetek> would it help multisig?
15 2014-11-08 02:11:38 <sinetek> "spendable pending ____'s approval"
16 2014-11-08 02:12:53 <earlz> sinetek: that's a different, but somewhat related issue
17 2014-11-08 02:13:40 <earlz> I think the concensus for that is that the incompletely signed tx should not be allowed on the chain because it may never become spendable
18 2014-11-08 02:13:59 <earlz> with locktime though it's different. It's guaranteed to eventually be spendable, even if it is ridiculously far in the future