1 2015-01-31 01:58:31 <dally> greetings
 2 2015-01-31 02:01:00 <dallyshalla> greetings
 3 2015-01-31 02:20:32 <azeteki> is C++ remarkably difficult to read, or am I just stupid?
 4 2015-01-31 02:20:40 <azeteki> (probably both)
 5 2015-01-31 02:20:59 <sipa> it compares very favorably against assembly, intercal, or perl
 6 2015-01-31 02:21:17 <azeteki> :D
 7 2015-01-31 02:21:48 <gmaxwell> it's often easy to 'read' without understanding (it can be pretty opaque)
 8 2015-01-31 02:21:52 <sipa> also, languages you're familiar with are usually easier
 9 2015-01-31 02:22:01 <sipa> yes, much more implicit behavior than C
10 2015-01-31 02:22:15 <azeteki> that's true, it just seems that.. hm. things are hidden in abstraction, if that makes sense.
11 2015-01-31 02:22:37 <sipa> which is very good for avoiding many shoot-yourself-in-the-foot problems (raii is a blessing)
12 2015-01-31 02:22:53 <sipa> but it also has hard to follow code floe as a result
13 2015-01-31 02:23:03 <gmaxwell> Yes, and sometimes that makes things much more clear.... but sometimes it does exactly the opposite (esp where _exact_ understanding is required)
14 2015-01-31 02:26:46 <phantomcircuit> at least cpp code tends to have less macro insanity..
15 2015-01-31 02:33:15 <gmaxwell> meh, there are extreme examples (e.g. openssl) but most C macro use is fine.
16 2015-01-31 02:34:04 <dallyshalla> greetings
17 2015-01-31 02:34:34 <dallyshalla> where might I find some information as to how to integrate bitcoin core with a qt5 application?
18 2015-01-31 02:48:59 <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, that's exactly the example i was thinking of