1 2015-02-24 00:00:07 <koobs> cfields: and did find this: https://dpaste.de/Gwhu/raw (Note: srcdir export line)
2 2015-02-24 00:00:48 <koobs> going to grab coffee
3 2015-02-24 00:55:10 <ajweiss> anybody here?
4 2015-02-24 00:57:46 <jgarzik> possibly
5 2015-02-24 04:03:31 <koobs> cfields: back
6 2015-02-24 05:00:46 <koobs> cfields: awake?
7 2015-02-24 05:01:35 <koobs> cfields: if so, eta on next point release tagging would be nice, so i know whether to wait, backport, or workaround (--disable-reduce-exports)
8 2015-02-24 05:03:52 <gmaxwell> there will be a point release fairly soon, almost certantly.
9 2015-02-24 05:06:59 <koobs> gmaxwell: danke
10 2015-02-24 05:07:08 <koobs> robbak: ^^
11 2015-02-24 05:17:39 <koobs> gmaxwell: typo?
12 2015-02-24 05:17:41 <koobs> AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to build test_bitcoin-qt])
13 2015-02-24 05:17:43 <koobs> if test x$use_tests$bitcoin_enable_qt_test = xyesyes; then
14 2015-02-24 05:17:53 <koobs> later in configure.ac, its
15 2015-02-24 05:17:54 <koobs> AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to build test_bitcoin])
16 2015-02-24 05:17:56 <koobs> if test x$use_tests = xyes; then
17 2015-02-24 05:27:42 <cfields> koobs: back
18 2015-02-24 05:27:59 <cfields> koobs: where's the typo there?
19 2015-02-24 05:28:00 <koobs> cfields: wb, added a ref to your pr, clarifying libstdc++ linking whether gcc/clang
20 2015-02-24 05:28:16 <koobs> cfields: tests enabled, i cant seem to get test_bitcoin-qt built
21 2015-02-24 05:28:42 <koobs> just asking re typo, im not an autotools guru
22 2015-02-24 05:29:15 <koobs> I do see this from configure though, which is odd for --enable-tests: checking whether to build test_bitcoin-qt... no
23 2015-02-24 05:31:45 <cfields> koobs: is qt building?
24 2015-02-24 05:32:08 <koobs> cfields: yep
25 2015-02-24 05:32:19 <koobs> checking whether to build Bitcoin Core GUI... yes (Qt4)
26 2015-02-24 05:32:45 <cfields> koobs: as i said, only the tests that can build will build. So if test_bitcoin-qt is missing some dep, it won't be built
27 2015-02-24 05:32:58 <koobs> cfields: what are the deps for it?
28 2015-02-24 05:33:23 <koobs> configure: running /bin/sh ./configure --disable-option-checking '--prefix=/usr/local' '--without-daemon' '--with-gui' '--without-libs' '--without-utils' '--disable-reduce-exports' '--without-qtdbus' '--disable-debug' '--with-qrencode' '--enable-tests' '--without-miniupnpc' '--enable-wallet' '--with-qt-includes ...
29 2015-02-24 05:33:31 <cfields> koobs: the key one here is likely QtTest
30 2015-02-24 05:33:45 <koobs> checking for QT... yes
31 2015-02-24 05:33:47 <koobs> checking for QT_TEST... no
32 2015-02-24 05:34:04 <cfields> there ya go
33 2015-02-24 05:34:25 <koobs> hmm, where does that come from
34 2015-02-24 05:34:56 <cfields> it's a qt lib like QtGUI or QtCore
35 2015-02-24 05:35:23 <koobs> right
36 2015-02-24 05:35:27 <koobs> i see testlib and qtestlib
37 2015-02-24 05:35:29 <koobs> are they different?
38 2015-02-24 05:35:37 <koobs> robbak: must have it installed (not cleanroom)
39 2015-02-24 05:35:48 <koobs> robbak: pkg version -v |grep -i qt output please
40 2015-02-24 05:36:01 <koobs> in pastebin
41 2015-02-24 05:36:14 <koobs> hmm
42 2015-02-24 05:36:16 <koobs> testlib_PORT= devel/${_QT_RELNAME}-testlib
43 2015-02-24 05:36:18 <koobs> testlib_PATH= ${QT_LIBDIR}/libQt${_QT_LIBVER}Test.so
44 2015-02-24 05:37:40 <koobs> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/qt4-testlib/pkg-plist?revision=371415&view=markup
45 2015-02-24 05:37:55 <koobs> cfields: qttest.so needed, or a binary ?
46 2015-02-24 05:37:57 <robbak> http://dpaste.com/0RXKV0N
47 2015-02-24 05:38:19 <robbak> when it wasn't complaining about the lack of 'output' and 'please' programs.
48 2015-02-24 05:39:13 <koobs> robbak: ok thats why
49 2015-02-24 05:39:16 <koobs> you have: qt4-testlib-4.8.6_1 = up-to-date with index
50 2015-02-24 05:39:20 <koobs> cleanroom poudriere build doesnt
51 2015-02-24 05:39:27 <koobs> another port bug squashed
52 2015-02-24 05:39:56 <robbak> My poud. build does build and install test-bitcoin-qt
53 2015-02-24 05:40:06 <cfields> koobs: just the .so
54 2015-02-24 05:40:49 <robbak> Scratch that, I don't know what I just did.
55 2015-02-24 05:41:35 <koobs> cfields: roger
56 2015-02-24 05:42:29 <cfields> koobs: er, just the lib package. obviously need the headers and pkg-config to go with it
57 2015-02-24 05:43:34 <koobs> cfields: yup, you get that too
58 2015-02-24 05:43:43 <koobs> cfields: bitcoin depends on pkg-config anyway, so its already there
59 2015-02-24 05:43:48 <koobs> </frameworkbenefits>
60 2015-02-24 05:44:20 <koobs> checking for QT... yes
61 2015-02-24 05:44:22 <koobs> checking for QT_TEST... yes
62 2015-02-24 05:44:24 <koobs> cfields: winning
63 2015-02-24 05:44:58 <koobs> cfields: correct me if im wrong, but the default bitcoin build gets built with --enable-tests right? (all else being equal, if dependencies are satisfied)
64 2015-02-24 05:45:13 <koobs> i much prefer to ship a port as per upstream defaults
65 2015-02-24 05:45:23 <koobs> in terms of any OPTIONS provided in the port
66 2015-02-24 05:46:02 <koobs> cfields: also, do you still want/need your freebsd shell account?
67 2015-02-24 05:46:03 <cfields> koobs: yes
68 2015-02-24 05:46:16 <cfields> koobs: i don't think so, thanks
69 2015-02-24 05:46:20 <koobs> cfields: pleasure
70 2015-02-24 05:46:53 <koobs> Removing user (cfields): mailspool home passwd.
71 2015-02-24 05:47:35 <cfields> koobs: you had the verification i needed before i even logged into the shell this morning. So it worked out :)
72 2015-02-24 05:47:44 <koobs> cfields: qt test code warning: https://dpaste.de/GBbJ/raw
73 2015-02-24 05:47:47 <koobs> cfields: \o/
74 2015-02-24 05:48:08 <koobs> robbak: yay, reproduced: Error: Orphaned: %%QT_BINDIR%%/test_bitcoin-qt
75 2015-02-24 05:48:31 <cfields> koobs: what compiler? I've never seen that warning
76 2015-02-24 05:48:39 <koobs> cfields: ummmmmmm
77 2015-02-24 05:48:56 <koobs> cfields: looks like cc (not clang)
78 2015-02-24 05:49:14 <koobs> ill run it through clang and see what i get
79 2015-02-24 05:49:28 <koobs> cfields: same cc as last nights testing (4.2.1 + patches from apple/google)
80 2015-02-24 05:49:38 <koobs> im not familiar with the extent of customization
81 2015-02-24 05:51:14 <koobs> cfields: full buildlog url in privmsg
82 2015-02-24 05:51:32 <koobs> its still building, but you'll see it there
83 2015-02-24 05:53:35 <koobs> there it goes
84 2015-02-24 05:53:43 <cfields> koobs: i assume it'll blow up in leveldb
85 2015-02-24 05:53:49 <koobs> it wont
86 2015-02-24 05:53:56 <koobs> wont/didnt
87 2015-02-24 05:54:13 <koobs> but lets see :)
88 2015-02-24 05:54:32 <koobs> nope, all good
89 2015-02-24 05:55:27 <robbak> I told you they have apolexies around here when you mention 4.2!
90 2015-02-24 05:57:54 <koobs> robbak: cant have enough warnings :)
91 2015-02-24 05:57:59 <koobs> diversity wins in that regard
92 2015-02-24 05:58:09 <koobs> especially for secure financial software
93 2015-02-24 05:58:11 <koobs> :]
94 2015-02-24 05:59:31 <koobs> cfields: if testlib when --enable-tests a build, run, or build/run dependency ?
95 2015-02-24 06:05:24 <cfields> testlib?
96 2015-02-24 06:05:35 <koobs> cfields: yup
97 2015-02-24 06:05:44 <cfields> you mean libqttest?
98 2015-02-24 06:05:50 <koobs> build, run, or build/run (i can declare with granularity)
99 2015-02-24 06:06:05 <koobs> cfields: umm, i dont know what the canonical name is, but in ports its called 'testlib'
100 2015-02-24 06:06:20 <koobs> cfields: it provides these files: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/qt4-testlib/pkg-plist?revision=371415&view=markup
101 2015-02-24 06:07:17 <koobs> cfields: one of which is: %%QT_LIBDIR%%/libQtTest.so (so im assuming yes in answer to your question)
102 2015-02-24 06:07:28 <cfields> koobs: if tests are enabled and qt is enabled, libqttest is needed for build and run
103 2015-02-24 06:07:36 <koobs> again, for bitcoin, is it a build only, run only, or build&run dependency ?
104 2015-02-24 06:07:40 <koobs> ok sweet
105 2015-02-24 06:07:49 <koobs> then no change necessary
106 2015-02-24 06:08:02 <koobs> cfields: thanks, i thought perhaps post static linking (if that were the case)
107 2015-02-24 06:08:13 <koobs> that the answer might be different (zero assumptions made)
108 2015-02-24 06:09:27 <koobs> robbak: almost there, hardening option to add now (default), and a test with clang
109 2015-02-24 06:09:42 <koobs> robbak: seems also to be working fine without the global CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS that were in there
110 2015-02-24 06:15:20 <robbak> That is the /include, /lib/ and -Wno-invalid-offset?
111 2015-02-24 06:15:53 <koobs> not the -Wno bit, just the CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS
112 2015-02-24 06:16:10 <robbak> -Wno was a CXXFLAGS
113 2015-02-24 06:16:46 <koobs> *looks*
114 2015-02-24 06:17:15 <robbak> I might have been able to tell you why/when that was put there, but I managed the port under a Redports SVN, shich is now gone.
115 2015-02-24 06:17:23 <koobs> robbak: sure
116 2015-02-24 06:17:27 <koobs> if you can, helpful
117 2015-02-24 06:17:59 <koobs> robbak:
118 2015-02-24 06:18:01 <koobs> +#CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include
119 2015-02-24 06:18:01 <robbak> svn commands in my repository just tell me it can't contact Redports.
120 2015-02-24 06:18:03 <koobs> +CXXFLAGS+= -Wno-invalid-offsetof
121 2015-02-24 06:18:05 <koobs> +#LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
122 2015-02-24 06:18:07 <koobs> i just commented those two out
123 2015-02-24 06:20:33 <koobs> robbak: im quite satisfied with our progress so far
124 2015-02-24 06:20:45 <koobs> have much more confidence in the resulting build/software on freebsd
125 2015-02-24 06:25:26 <robbak> koobs: Is there any way to pull svn logs if you can't access the remote repository?
126 2015-02-24 06:25:35 <koobs> robbak: i dont believe so
127 2015-02-24 06:25:45 <koobs> i may be wrong
128 2015-02-24 06:26:37 <robbak> OK. I have found that I added that CXXFLAGS. Checking freshports to see when.
129 2015-02-24 06:29:45 <koobs> robbak: daemon and bitcoin build clean. added hardening option (default), testing utils now
130 2015-02-24 06:32:22 <koobs> utils is good
131 2015-02-24 06:32:33 <robbak> -Wno-invalid-offset goes back to version 0.3.23 in 2011. High time I tested whether it is still needed!
132 2015-02-24 06:32:59 <koobs> robbak: cfields , comments? ^
133 2015-02-24 06:33:36 <koobs> clang++ -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIE -I. -I./include -D_REENTRANT -DOS_FREEBSD -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POS
134 2015-02-24 06:33:38 <koobs> IX -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wstack-protector -fstack-protector-all -fPIE -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -
135 2015-02-24 06:33:40 <koobs> U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c util/status.cc -o util/status.o
136 2015-02-24 06:33:42 <koobs> i see some duplicate flags here
137 2015-02-24 06:34:05 <koobs> wonder if upstream is doing things with flags it shouldnt be
138 2015-02-24 06:34:09 <koobs> s/flags/user flags
139 2015-02-24 06:35:33 <robbak> I almost certain that upstream is setting all sorts of flags.
140 2015-02-24 06:36:17 <koobs> setting is fine, duping/using user flags and concatting/appending is not good though
141 2015-02-24 06:36:56 <cfields> koobs / robbak: mind joining #bitcoin-build for discussing?
142 2015-02-24 08:11:12 <Luke-Jr> evoskuil: sorry for the confusion over the NDEBUG - I thought you were removing something that had already been there, didn't notice it was being added and then removed..
143 2015-02-24 10:43:21 <gdm85> is there a rescan=false for importwallet?
144 2015-02-24 10:43:35 <gdm85> or it is just based on the timestamp?
145 2015-02-24 10:44:10 <sipa> just based on timestamp
146 2015-02-24 10:44:16 <gdm85> ah, nice. thanks
147 2015-02-24 10:44:27 <sipa> and it rescans only the necessary part
148 2015-02-24 10:44:36 <gdm85> makes sense.
149 2015-02-24 10:44:52 <sipa> which is far superior to just boolean rescan on/off
150 2015-02-24 10:46:11 <gdm85> didn't peek at the code of vanitygen, and I am far from using it from anything than testing, but I wonder how it is generating the private keys
151 2015-02-24 10:47:04 <sipa> private keys are just random 32-byte arrays
152 2015-02-24 10:47:34 <gdm85> sipa: more like: if it's picking such random data in a cryptographically sound way. I see it's using libssl.
153 2015-02-24 10:47:43 <sipa> no clue, i would hope so
154 2015-02-24 10:51:38 <koobs> ACTION prepares to land the 0.10.0 freebsd port
155 2015-02-24 11:12:36 <koobs> https://twitter.com/koobs/status/570179490749423616
156 2015-02-24 11:12:49 <koobs> Luke-Jr sipa cfields thank you for all your help :)
157 2015-02-24 11:13:18 <sipa> yw!
158 2015-02-24 11:33:03 <midnightmagic> mm.. that's a lot of troubles he had.
159 2015-02-24 11:33:21 <midnightmagic> suddenly I'm wondering when the last time netbsd passed the test suite actually was.
160 2015-02-24 11:34:31 <midnightmagic> doh. 0.9.2.1
161 2015-02-24 11:38:32 <wumpus> no one is keeping up to date with master on netbsd?
162 2015-02-24 11:39:11 <wumpus> why not? has it always needed heavy patching to compile/work at all?
163 2015-02-24 11:40:36 <midnightmagic> not sure. since I helped that fellow build on pkgsrc I'm not sure it was purified and committed to master. no I guess not, it's still at 0.8.x in pkgsrc wip tree.
164 2015-02-24 11:41:11 <midnightmagic> it didn't need heavy patching; just some minor things. the last I heard from him was he asked for an opinion on what to do with the deviations.
165 2015-02-24 11:41:32 <midnightmagic> i made a pullreq to get opinion and everyone told me to push it to upstreams. :)
166 2015-02-24 11:42:52 <midnightmagic> leveldb needed a port exception for byte_order macro, that sort of thing.
167 2015-02-24 11:47:06 <wumpus> agreed it is kind of unfortunate, but indeed the place for leveldb changes is upstream, the less of a patch set we have to maintain against it the better
168 2015-02-24 11:48:05 <koobs> we have a local patch for the bundled leveldb source
169 2015-02-24 11:48:09 <koobs> it might matter on netbsd too
170 2015-02-24 11:48:43 <koobs> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net-p2p/bitcoin/files/patch-memenv.cc_enable_limit_macros?revision=379779&view=markup
171 2015-02-24 11:48:46 <midnightmagic> that is the current method they're using. they don't like maintaining local patches and were trying to get me to push it up to bitcoin.
172 2015-02-24 11:49:07 <koobs> we'll run local patch but have a strong pref for upstreaming longer term
173 2015-02-24 11:49:19 <midnightmagic> ACTION shrugs.
174 2015-02-24 11:49:21 <sipa> koobs: same :)
175 2015-02-24 11:49:27 <sipa> upstream leveldb is the place
176 2015-02-24 11:49:37 <midnightmagic> given the extensive patching they do for other critical packages...
177 2015-02-24 11:51:06 <midnightmagic> (pkgsrc I mean)
178 2015-02-24 11:51:51 <midnightmagic> rodent was a really nice guy though, impeccably civil :)
179 2015-02-24 11:52:07 <Cryo> rodent is a nice guy.
180 2015-02-24 11:55:04 <Cryo> it's 1 line? seriously?
181 2015-02-24 11:55:26 <koobs> Cryo: our patch?
182 2015-02-24 11:55:44 <Cryo> yeh he one you pasted the url for
183 2015-02-24 11:56:13 <koobs> seriously what?
184 2015-02-24 11:56:15 <koobs> :)
185 2015-02-24 11:56:21 <koobs> are 1 line patches not allowed?
186 2015-02-24 11:58:15 <Cryo> that's going upstream?
187 2015-02-24 11:59:37 <koobs> Cryo: i was just showing what freebsd had locally, in case it was relevant to other platforms
188 2015-02-24 11:59:43 <koobs> Cryo: we have proposed it upstream
189 2015-02-24 11:59:46 <koobs> havent*
190 2015-02-24 12:22:23 <midnightmagic> am I missing something? it's a one-line change now to detect the db4.8 lib properly and it just builds. was that leveldb fixing for netbsd or bitcoin?!
191 2015-02-24 12:23:08 <midnightmagic> ./test/test_bitcoin passes 133 tests. am I done?
192 2015-02-24 12:23:19 <midnightmagic> ehh. sleeptime. i'll pick up tomorrow
193 2015-02-24 12:23:33 <Diablo-D3> midnightmagic: heh.
194 2015-02-24 14:52:10 <sdaftuar> sipa: was wondering if in #5820 there's a reason for the window based on time (30 days) versus a block height difference (I guess a height difference of more than 30*144)?
195 2015-02-24 14:52:46 <sdaftuar> i don't have a specific concern with the test using time, but i've noticed recently that time-based tests are more brittle in regtest testing
196 2015-02-24 16:42:43 <easye> Which version of Boost is bitcoin-core-0.10.0 supposed to be linked against? I can't seem to find an explicit statement of version in the doc/* files.
197 2015-02-24 16:43:14 <easye> I assume boost-1.57.0?
198 2015-02-24 16:47:18 <bedeho> easye: Yes, that works for m
199 2015-02-24 16:47:19 <bedeho> me
200 2015-02-24 16:47:57 <bedeho> oops, wrong channel, never mind, mixed up my libs.
201 2015-02-24 17:03:16 <earlz> Is LLVM/clang a support compiler for bitcoin?
202 2015-02-24 17:03:31 <easye> bedeho: Thanks for the confirmation. My problem involves the Qt Moc header as detailed in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-22829, so this is apparently a QT4 problem.
203 2015-02-24 17:04:09 <earlz> running into really weird issues on OSX.. If I just configure and make, I end up getting missing std references.. tried using -stdlib=libstdc++, but then that gets me stuck at "No working boost sleep implementation found"
204 2015-02-24 17:05:17 <bedeho> as I said, I mistyped, I have not built bitcoin-core before I'm afraid :/. That message does perhaps indicate that your verson of boost does not have all required parts, e.g. being to old
205 2015-02-24 17:05:29 <bedeho> I think 1.57.0 is the newest, its what Ive built for another lib
206 2015-02-24 17:05:53 <earlz> I installed the latest version from brew, just as the build-osx document sas
207 2015-02-24 17:05:56 <earlz> says*
208 2015-02-24 17:06:36 <earlz> I mean, if I don't set LDFLAGS, then it configures but then fails later at linking when it can't find all std references
209 2015-02-24 17:07:04 <earlz> If I set ldflags to use libstdc++, then I can't get configure to get past the boost sleep check (though it detects all over boost stuff fine)
210 2015-02-24 17:07:36 <earlz> Tried a few ther random things like including -lpthread and such, but nothing helps it
211 2015-02-24 17:10:13 <bedeho> Sorry, I wish I could help, if you stick arround, I bet some super helpful and knowledgeable devs will be able to help you, e.g. wumpus, sipa, hearn, jgarzik, etc.
212 2015-02-24 17:10:47 <earlz> yea, I lurk in here 24/7 anyway lol
213 2015-02-24 17:10:56 <earlz> so if anyone pings me I'll see it eventually
214 2015-02-24 17:11:32 <hearn> earlz: i've seen the "no working boost sleep" thing before. it's mentioned in the issue tracker.
215 2015-02-24 17:11:42 <hearn> earlz: iirc switching to homebrew and reinstalling all the dependencies fixed it for me
216 2015-02-24 17:50:31 <jgarzik> earlz, gcc is the officially supported compiler, but we want to add support for clang -- file a bug, if you see a specific, reproducible problem
217 2015-02-24 17:53:07 <waxwing> is it normal to see cpu usage going up a lot when trying to do importaddress into a testnet instance? is this rescanning?
218 2015-02-24 18:13:41 <jgarzik> waxwing, yes
219 2015-02-24 18:14:09 <waxwing> thx, i see
220 2015-02-24 18:16:22 <Starduster> +1
221 2015-02-24 18:39:13 <dfletcher> latest git giving me this in MinGW build http://pastebin.com/6K3kymxD .. am i forgetting something or did something change in configure recently? I was able to build the last rc3 or 4 just fine (I forget exactly which)
222 2015-02-24 18:49:51 <LyndsySimon> Is discussion of applications and concepts using Bitcoin's network acceptable in this channel?
223 2015-02-24 18:56:10 <jcorgan> not really. #bitcoin is fine for that, as long as you're really discussing something that is specific to bitcoin, and not just general "blockchain woo" stuff
224 2015-02-24 19:01:15 <D-Student> Bitcoin-qt should have an option to import a specific block. I've been trying to sync the blockchain for 3 days now. I cannot see my wallet balance becuase I'm on block 319xxx and my balance unspents are in 33xxxx.
225 2015-02-24 19:05:58 <dfletcher> ahhh needs pkg-config now, nice easy solution that works with mingw on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149479.msg10409852#msg10409852
226 2015-02-24 19:32:25 <denisx> hmm, is it possible that after the last difficulty change one share of diff1 is worth less then one satoshi?
227 2015-02-24 20:49:05 <Eliel> denisx: why would it not be possible?
228 2015-02-24 21:05:20 <cfields> jgarzik: fyi, clang is used for travis and the released osx binaries
229 2015-02-24 21:06:53 <cfields> easye: nearly all boost versions should be supported, but boost is quite picky about a few things. The main thing to keep in mind is that you should link it and bitcoin against the same std lib, or you're asking for headaches
230 2015-02-24 21:31:41 <denisx> Eliel: because 25 bitcoins / difficulty is less than a satoshi
231 2015-02-24 22:44:37 <cfields> koobs: around?
232 2015-02-24 22:53:08 <sipa> jgarzik: osx releases are built with clang already
233 2015-02-24 23:24:18 <koobs> cfields: yep
234 2015-02-24 23:25:33 <cfields> koobs: is there a bsd command for finding the default c/c++ compilers?
235 2015-02-24 23:25:51 <cfields> or a standard env var/symlink ?
236 2015-02-24 23:26:06 <cfields> sorry, freebsd
237 2015-02-24 23:26:20 <koobs> no, cc is the default
238 2015-02-24 23:26:27 <koobs> on 10 and later cc *is* clang
239 2015-02-24 23:26:35 <cfields> cc and c++ ?
240 2015-02-24 23:26:38 <koobs> correct
241 2015-02-24 23:26:44 <cfields> great, thanks
242 2015-02-24 23:26:50 <koobs> koobs@10-STABLE-amd64:/etc % cc -v
243 2015-02-24 23:26:52 <koobs> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
244 2015-02-24 23:26:58 <koobs> koobs@10-STABLE-amd64:/etc % c++ -v
245 2015-02-24 23:27:00 <koobs> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
246 2015-02-24 23:27:06 <koobs> note the version (10-stable)
247 2015-02-24 23:29:02 <cfields> koobs: is libc++ default for >= 10 ?
248 2015-02-24 23:29:41 <phantomcircuit> sipa, isn't that a bit dangerous?
249 2015-02-24 23:34:12 <koobs> cfields: clang can use both GNU libstdc++ and libc++, depending on the -stdlib= option. On 9.x it uses the former by default, on 10.x and later the latter.
250 2015-02-24 23:34:23 <koobs> cfields: as per: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5819#issuecomment-75699877
251 2015-02-24 23:34:38 <cfields> perfect, thanks
252 2015-02-24 23:39:53 <cfields> koobs: could you please run <bitcoin-root>/depends/config.guess and tell me the output?
253 2015-02-24 23:42:18 <koobs> cfields: for which build (qt/utils/daemon) and which freebsd version?
254 2015-02-24 23:42:50 <cfields> koobs: any, it's a static script. any bsd version
255 2015-02-24 23:43:01 <koobs> cfields: see privmsg
256 2015-02-24 23:43:03 <koobs> for logs
257 2015-02-24 23:43:07 <koobs> thats 10
258 2015-02-24 23:43:12 <koobs> oh you want config.guess
259 2015-02-24 23:43:14 <koobs> my apologies
260 2015-02-24 23:43:20 <koobs> will get it for you when i get back from coffee
261 2015-02-24 23:43:27 <koobs> ~45 mins
262 2015-02-24 23:43:42 <cfields> got it, thanks
263 2015-02-24 23:44:00 <koobs> actually one tick
264 2015-02-24 23:44:06 <koobs> ll get you contents
265 2015-02-24 23:44:26 <cfields> no worries, i got what i needed
266 2015-02-24 23:44:47 <koobs> ok
267 2015-02-24 23:44:50 <koobs> back soon