1 2015-07-31 06:15:52 <wumpus> halitosis: the incomplete line is the first line of the *next* run
 2 2015-07-31 06:16:56 <wumpus> nothing to be seen there than a sudden crash. The only hope for troubleshooting it would be  some message printed to the console, I guess. And run it in gdb next time.
 3 2015-07-31 10:51:08 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: you once mentioned that copying the whole qt file for the wallet fork would also be possible. Do you thing including both qt directories in the autoconf/automake process would work when wrapping everything in a namespace?
 4 2015-07-31 10:51:20 <jonasschnelli> s/ qt file>s<
 5 2015-07-31 11:10:02 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: sure, you'd want to compile either one of them - not both
 6 2015-07-31 11:10:14 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: (based on a configure-time parameter)
 7 2015-07-31 11:12:24 <jonasschnelli> Yes. I have thought about that. Just some of my last experiments told me that it can really easy mess up without a namespace...
 8 2015-07-31 11:12:40 <jonasschnelli> even with the right "make clean" after configure
 9 2015-07-31 11:13:02 <jonasschnelli> but yes. I try with just a copy and a configure variable switch
10 2015-07-31 11:13:22 <jonasschnelli> ... i mean i go and try with copying the whole dir
11 2015-07-31 11:21:27 <jonasschnelli> thanks.
12 2015-07-31 11:26:38 <wumpus> sure, you can use namespacing as well, it helps keep the codebases separate
13 2015-07-31 11:26:49 <wumpus> on top of the build system support
14 2015-07-31 11:27:08 <wumpus> (and moving them to separate directories)