1 2015-10-02 01:34:48 <FredEE> hey all :)
 2 2015-10-02 01:42:53 <crescendo> hey Fred :)
 3 2015-10-02 03:03:12 <kanzure> XexorZ: http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bitcoin/scalingbitcoin-review.pdf
 4 2015-10-02 07:05:41 <wumpus> hm lightningbot was not banned here
 5 2015-10-02 07:08:13 <Luke-Jr> wumpus: why not?
 6 2015-10-02 07:09:18 <wumpus> don't know, I remember banning it both here and in #bitcoin-core-dev when it was in the connect/disconnect loop, but apparantly forgot to do it here (that's a drawback of having joins/parts hidden)
 7 2015-10-02 11:16:12 <TZander> just to verify;   unsigned char *c;   if (*c) return  true;    is that not per defintiion returning true?
 8 2015-10-02 11:16:50 <TZander> Hmm, wait, I should rubber duck before irc.  No, it can have a zero
 9 2015-10-02 11:21:15 <wumpus> I'd expect a segfault from that, you're dereferencing an uninitialized pointer
10 2015-10-02 11:39:54 <NIJKAMP> Hey guys, how`s going? i hope fine :P i did 1 week ago a new faucet http://casinofaucetbitc.com/ we are thinking about increase satoshis per hour? what do you think? give a try :) and if anyone with faucets want to change links with me free welcome to do :) regards
11 2015-10-02 13:12:40 <OxADADA> cool ^^^
12 2015-10-02 16:25:49 <nwilcox> Does anyone know why depends builds boost with --layout=tagged ?  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/packages/boost.mk#L10
13 2015-10-02 16:27:11 <nwilcox> We've seen linking fail on one debian 8 system, but not on another debian 8 system, where -lboost_system is in LDLIBS...
14 2015-10-02 16:38:33 <moa> nwilcox: configure.ac
15 2015-10-02 16:40:12 <moa> around line 533
16 2015-10-02 16:42:29 <moa> nwilcox: what was the failure error?
17 2015-10-02 16:45:34 <nwilcox> moa: Nevermind, it was a bug in my own modifications, not in upstream.  :-<
18 2015-10-02 16:47:31 <nwilcox> I'm still curious though why boost is built with --layout=tagged, which looks as if it were deprecated ~5 years ago: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4936
19 2015-10-02 16:50:56 <nwilcox> Also, it reverts a change by satoshi, which violates the One Great True Unquestionable Vision of what bitcoin's library linkage names should be: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/68b973a913fd1569d3a9a444d4233b15f7866e3e#diff-9cd9af8311354bb51e5c35da9f149cdfL24
20 2015-10-02 16:51:00 <nwilcox> :-p
21 2015-10-02 18:26:53 <coin_trader> hey fellas - got a question for the blockchain sleuths & wizards
22 2015-10-02 18:27:00 <coin_trader> TXID: 697664e01e918289f4e6f70f111c7980db04ca8c7f116f22909a799e16700cb6
23 2015-10-02 18:27:07 <coin_trader> not found on blockchain info or tradeblock - but exists on blocktrail and btc.blockr
24 2015-10-02 18:27:14 <coin_trader> anyone got clues as to why?
25 2015-10-02 18:27:24 <coin_trader> other TXs from this node have never had issue, and it would appear it was sent with normal/correct fee (0.00016658
26 2015-10-02 18:27:47 <coin_trader> BTC for 225 bytes)
27 2015-10-02 18:28:01 <coin_trader> bitcoin-cli listtransactions | grep 1TheAddress -- returns nada
28 2015-10-02 18:28:21 <coin_trader> never seen this before, the node has sent tens of thousands of tx without issue...
29 2015-10-02 18:28:35 <coin_trader> it's running core v.10
30 2015-10-02 18:29:41 <OxADADA> coin_trader: how many confirmations does btc.blockr say it have?
31 2015-10-02 18:29:48 <coin_trader> zero
32 2015-10-02 18:30:17 <coin_trader> on blockr you can see it going into and then coming out of the addy, but it's all unconfirmed -- it's not even found on bc.info or tradeblock
33 2015-10-02 18:30:35 <OxADADA> coin_trader: so if it hasn't been confirmed, its possible the blocks don't yet exist on the other services.
34 2015-10-02 18:30:45 <coin_trader> dude it's from yesterday
35 2015-10-02 18:30:59 <coin_trader> the node has send - again - thousands of transactions without issue
36 2015-10-02 18:31:15 <coin_trader> it's still sending tx now, too
37 2015-10-02 18:31:29 <coin_trader> something went haywire with that particular one, but i dont know why this would be
38 2015-10-02 18:31:40 <paveljanik> coin_trader, funding tx is unconfirmed, its funding tx too, ...
39 2015-10-02 18:31:42 <coin_trader> i cannot find a record on my node's memory of this even
40 2015-10-02 18:31:51 <OxADADA> coin_trader: it looks like it hasn't been put into a block yet. so its just sitting in the mempool
41 2015-10-02 18:32:36 <OxADADA> coin_trader: looks like the transaction has been rejected by multiple nodes, its invalid transaction
42 2015-10-02 18:32:43 <coin_trader> why is it invalid? details please
43 2015-10-02 18:32:58 <coin_trader> and how do i determine this information on my own?
44 2015-10-02 18:34:15 <OxADADA> coin_trader: i'd have to see the raw txn to see why its invalid, but pasting it into blockchain.info says its been rejected (therefore invalid)
45 2015-10-02 18:34:30 <coin_trader> any idea how i can pull this data from bitcoin-cli ?
46 2015-10-02 18:35:25 <OxADADA> coin_trader: `gettransaction 697664e01e918289f4e6f70f111c7980db04ca8c7f116f22909a799e16700cb6`
47 2015-10-02 18:36:11 <coin_trader> here you go: http://www.hastebin.com/ipamoyuxej
48 2015-10-02 18:37:45 <coin_trader> (i was trying listtransactions | grep filter* and getting nowhere)
49 2015-10-02 18:37:52 <coin_trader> good looks on the gettransaction
50 2015-10-02 18:38:02 <coin_trader> still a bit confused as to what is wrong with it
51 2015-10-02 18:39:32 <OxADADA> coin_trader: 0.25Ƀ to analyze it :P
52 2015-10-02 18:39:45 <coin_trader> wow expensive
53 2015-10-02 18:39:58 <OxADADA> coin_trader: i'm too busy :)
54 2015-10-02 18:40:02 <coin_trader> thought this channel was all about altruism :p
55 2015-10-02 18:40:26 <OxADADA> coin_trader: altruism only works for those whos time is worth nothing.
56 2015-10-02 18:43:02 <jgarzik> Let's keep it to bitcoin development related topics
57 2015-10-02 18:43:10 <jgarzik> #bitcoin is better suited for support
58 2015-10-02 18:43:57 <OxADADA> coin_trader: -> #bitcoin
59 2015-10-02 18:44:18 <coin_trader> k sorry jeff i'll ask there
60 2015-10-02 18:46:49 <jgarzik> thanks
61 2015-10-02 19:19:46 <ahmed__> anyone here know why bitcoind still wouldnt show transactions when txindex is turned on
62 2015-10-02 19:19:50 <ahmed__> (that dont belong to me)
63 2015-10-02 19:21:42 <Apocalyptic> it's not in the best chain your bitcoind is aware of or not in your mempool
64 2015-10-02 19:37:05 <zooko> b#t
65 2015-10-02 19:37:07 <zooko> oops
66 2015-10-02 19:48:40 <Luke-Jr> ahmed__: #bitcoin
67 2015-10-02 20:57:27 <mist_> Hey fellas, i have a few transactions that i don't know what happened to
68 2015-10-02 20:57:51 <Luke-Jr> mist_: #bitcoin
69 2015-10-02 22:19:04 <davec> Is there an ageed upon standard for the block height to specify from an SPV-style wallet client?  Obviously the service bit for full node won't be set, but I've seen some report their currently known header height and others report 0.
70 2015-10-02 22:19:29 <davec> in regards to the versoin message
71 2015-10-02 22:28:29 <BlueMatt> davec: I think you *should* report a real number
72 2015-10-02 22:28:39 <BlueMatt> the reason most people do 0 is probably just because they're lazy and it doesnt break anything
73 2015-10-02 22:31:27 <Luke-Jr> if you report 0, I'd be inclined to think your node is broken :P
74 2015-10-02 22:36:59 <davec> thanks.  That is in line with my thinking as well, but I wanted to make sure there wasn't something I'm not aware of since I've seen an increasing number of them reporting 0
75 2015-10-02 22:42:46 <ProfMac> does it make any sense for the demon to respond to an IPv6 multicast address, to aid in locating nodes?
76 2015-10-02 22:43:33 <Luke-Jr> sure, if in the rare occasion multicast actually works, can't hurt to use it