1 2015-12-06 00:58:45 <CubicEar_> Anyone have the IRC channel for the conference?
 2 2015-12-06 00:58:46 <CubicEar_> Anyone have the IRC channel for the conference?
 3 2015-12-06 00:59:12 <Lightsword> think it is #bitcoin-workshops
 4 2015-12-06 00:59:47 <CubicEar_> thanks
 5 2015-12-06 00:59:48 <CubicEar_> thanks
 6 2015-12-06 01:14:41 <Lightsword> so it looks like antpool will be the last pool needed to reach the BIP65 activation threshold, there are still a few smaller pools that haven’t upgraded notably mybtccoin, and eclipse from what I’m seeing, ghash and bitfury may have missed a node or two as well(they are producing mixed v3/v4 blocks). There is a mystery pool mining to address 19f8Pk3m1GySyowWb8qLy93R5ngAUoVoUE that also seems to not be upgraded
 7 2015-12-06 01:14:42 <Lightsword> so it looks like antpool will be the last pool needed to reach the BIP65 activation threshold, there are still a few smaller pools that haven’t upgraded notably mybtccoin, and eclipse from what I’m seeing, ghash and bitfury may have missed a node or two as well(they are producing mixed v3/v4 blocks). There is a mystery pool mining to address 19f8Pk3m1GySyowWb8qLy93R5ngAUoVoUE that also seems to not be upgraded
 8 2015-12-06 01:42:03 <Luke-Jr> I'm surprised Eclipse hasn't. They were asking me for an update before I had it ready.
 9 2015-12-06 01:42:53 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: missed the window of interest. :)
10 2015-12-06 01:43:05 <gmaxwell> might want to remind them that it's ready now.
11 2015-12-06 01:43:15 <Luke-Jr> I wonder if they did update bitcoind, but forgot to bump their Eloipool block version
12 2015-12-06 01:46:09 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: uh, eloipool checks with bitcoin right; it's not at risk of signaling 4 when bitcoin is only 3?
13 2015-12-06 01:46:30 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: it won't use templates with a version < what it's configured for
14 2015-12-06 01:47:52 <gmaxwell> k.
15 2015-12-06 01:47:53 <gmaxwell> k.
16 2015-12-06 01:50:21 <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, eclipse has really bad latency...
17 2015-12-06 01:53:42 <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, is it actively maintained?
18 2015-12-06 01:55:16 <Lightsword> anyone have any idea who that weird NOMP pool with address 19f8Pk3m1GySyowWb8qLy93R5ngAUoVoUE is?
19 2015-12-06 02:00:26 <Lightsword> antpool should be fully on v4 within a few days from the looks of it
20 2015-12-06 02:00:39 <gmaxwell> Lightsword: try googling each of these addresses? https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0081b744928ce18e/addresses
21 2015-12-06 02:02:08 <Lightsword> gmaxwell, I googled the generation address but didn’t get any hits
22 2015-12-06 02:15:10 <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: dunno
23 2015-12-06 02:15:22 <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: for some definition of "actively"
24 2015-12-06 02:20:12 <Lightsword> gmaxwell, checked the other ones and no hits other than block explorers
25 2015-12-06 03:19:26 <btcdrak> gmaxwell: cant we solve scalability using a DHT?
26 2015-12-06 03:20:50 <btcdrak> :-p
27 2015-12-06 03:21:44 <gmaxwell> Only on universes where attacks don't happen, and in those universes we don't need blocks at all, seas of unconfirmed transactions would be fine. :P
28 2015-12-06 15:44:53 <jl2012> Antpool is mining both v3 and v4 now. As soon as they completely migrate, the softfork will complete in less than 5 days. Maybe it's time to issue a warning to all old nodes
29 2015-12-06 15:49:52 <JWU42> jl2012: this is to be sure we are on 0.11.2 ?
30 2015-12-06 15:51:29 <jl2012> JWU42: only 0.11.2 and 0.10.4 are safe for mining purpose
31 2015-12-06 16:08:48 <tulip> jl2012: they should show a warning by themselves.
32 2015-12-06 16:10:23 <jcorgan> kanzure: thanks for the transcripts
33 2015-12-06 16:10:24 <jcorgan> kanzure: thanks for the transcripts
34 2015-12-06 16:11:33 <jl2012> tulip: oh yes. But people may not be aware of that it will suddenly happen, as all we need is Antpool to support
35 2015-12-06 16:12:23 <kanzure> jcorgan: yup. do you know the names of the people on the miner panel? having trouble typing this one.
36 2015-12-06 16:13:50 <kanzure> they introduce themselves in https://youtube.com/watch?v=H-ErmmDQRFs&t=19m16s but i don't know how to type these names
37 2015-12-06 16:13:51 <kanzure> they introduce themselves in https://youtube.com/watch?v=H-ErmmDQRFs&t=19m16s but i don't know how to type these names
38 2015-12-06 16:15:17 <jcorgan> sorry, can't help you there
39 2015-12-06 16:17:01 <kanzure> maybe i will just give them numbers :(
40 2015-12-06 16:17:55 <jcorgan> you can always edit the names in later as it gets figured out
41 2015-12-06 16:17:56 <jcorgan> you can always edit the names in later as it gets figured out
42 2015-12-06 16:18:55 <jcorgan> so as long as they are distinguished somehow as you type, i think you're fine
43 2015-12-06 16:19:21 <kanzure> maybe i should just learn chinese. seems easier.
44 2015-12-06 16:19:22 <kanzure> maybe i should just learn chinese. seems easier.
45 2015-12-06 16:21:55 <tulip> jl2012: I doubt anybody notices the alert system regardless.
46 2015-12-06 16:23:40 <tulip> jl2012: the errors field in bitcoind can be set by someone sending an invalid p2p message to you. I think it's retry unlikely anybody monitors that or they would be constantly complaining that there's a peer on the network which sometimes sends invalid messages.
47 2015-12-06 16:23:57 <jl2012> tulip: also a reminder for no SPV mining
48 2015-12-06 16:23:58 <jl2012> tulip: also a reminder for no SPV mining
49 2015-12-06 16:24:42 <btcdrak> JWU42: jl2012: if you are mining, better to use 0.11.2 because we didnt backport BIP113 to 0.10.4
50 2015-12-06 16:25:55 <btcdrak> JWU42: jl2012: if you are mining, better to use 0.11.2 because we didnt backport BIP113 to 0.10.4
51 2015-12-06 16:27:08 <jl2012> no i'm not. One of my node is actually running 0.9.5 as I have some other appications not compatiable with 0.10
52 2015-12-06 16:27:09 <jl2012> no i'm not. One of my node is actually running 0.9.5 as I have some other appications not compatiable with 0.10
53 2015-12-06 21:02:04 <JWU42> jl2012: yeah, not mining either...
54 2015-12-06 22:05:03 <asdfaw324234> when does the next livestream start?
55 2015-12-06 22:05:22 <asdfaw324234> oh 3 hours
56 2015-12-06 22:05:45 <kanzure> should be 2.
57 2015-12-06 22:07:28 <gijensen> Is it 2? Thanks, I thought 3 as well for some reason
58 2015-12-06 22:15:25 <sipa> 2:45
59 2015-12-06 22:15:53 <kanzure> oops.
60 2015-12-06 22:15:54 <kanzure> oops.
61 2015-12-06 22:16:55 <sipa> (i hope!)