1 2015-12-31 01:30:03 <stevenroose_> hi
 2 2015-12-31 01:30:14 <stevenroose_> I get a Qt-related error when building bitcoin-qt
 3 2015-12-31 01:30:15 <stevenroose_> https://gist.github.com/stevenroose/7c8b2b1186391b646318
 4 2015-12-31 01:30:46 <stevenroose_> /usr/include/qt5/QtCore/qglobal.h:1067:4: error: #error "You must build your code with position independent code if Qt was built with -reduce-relocations. " "Compile your code with -fPIC (-fPIE is not enough)."
 5 2015-12-31 01:31:24 <stevenroose_> I replaced both occurrences of -fPIE with -fPIC but it still failed
 6 2015-12-31 01:31:31 <stevenroose_> (in the Makefile)
 7 2015-12-31 01:32:14 <phantomcircuit> stevenroose_, what os?
 8 2015-12-31 01:33:57 <stevenroose_> Fedora
 9 2015-12-31 01:34:02 <stevenroose_> 22 I think
10 2015-12-31 01:35:56 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit: any idea?
11 2015-12-31 01:36:36 <phantomcircuit> stevenroose_, did you compile qt yourself?
12 2015-12-31 01:36:41 <stevenroose_> nope
13 2015-12-31 01:36:47 <stevenroose_> just used the package manager
14 2015-12-31 01:37:16 <stevenroose_> is it possible that somedependencies are missing? It wasn't easy to find all the mentioned packages since the naming conventions are different in fedora
15 2015-12-31 01:37:40 <stevenroose_> However, I use KDE5, which uses Qt5 for everything so I believe most Qt5-related stuff must already be installed
16 2015-12-31 01:37:55 <stevenroose_> I installed several qt5-***-devel packages
17 2015-12-31 01:38:08 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit:
18 2015-12-31 01:39:01 <phantomcircuit> stevenroose_, that error indicates that the qt5 libraries were built without -fPIC
19 2015-12-31 01:39:12 <phantomcircuit> which is weird
20 2015-12-31 01:39:16 <phantomcircuit> warren, ^
21 2015-12-31 01:39:24 <phantomcircuit> maybe he can help you, i've no idea
22 2015-12-31 01:39:51 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit: doesnt it say that qt is built with -reduce-relocations
23 2015-12-31 01:43:38 <Luke-Jr> stevenroose_: known issue, fixed in git
24 2015-12-31 01:43:40 <Luke-Jr> not sure if backported yet
25 2015-12-31 01:43:57 <stevenroose_> ah
26 2015-12-31 01:44:08 <stevenroose_> well, to be honest, I'm trying to build elements alpha
27 2015-12-31 01:44:26 <Luke-Jr> nope
28 2015-12-31 01:44:36 <stevenroose_> so they might not have merged new fixes in bitcoins repo
29 2015-12-31 01:44:38 <Luke-Jr> hmm
30 2015-12-31 01:44:46 <Luke-Jr> was Alpha based on 0.10 or 0.11?
31 2015-12-31 01:45:06 <Luke-Jr> try merging my backports-for-0.10.5 or backports-for-0.11.3 branch
32 2015-12-31 01:46:05 <stevenroose_> can I see somewhere in the repo what core version it is?
33 2015-12-31 01:46:15 <stevenroose_> a metafile or something
34 2015-12-31 01:46:28 <Luke-Jr> configure.ac perhaps
35 2015-12-31 01:46:38 <Luke-Jr> top ~8 lines
36 2015-12-31 01:47:06 <stevenroose_> https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/blob/alpha/configure.ac#L1
37 2015-12-31 01:47:27 <stevenroose_> it seems like they've changed it
38 2015-12-31 01:47:46 <stevenroose_> perhaps I should try to build bitcoin from the repo
39 2015-12-31 01:48:02 <stevenroose_> and file an issue with alpha if building core works fine :)
40 2015-12-31 01:48:09 <stevenroose_> or is the fix not merged yet?
41 2015-12-31 01:49:07 <Luke-Jr> git fetch git://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin backports-for-0.10.5 && git merge FETCH_HEAD
42 2015-12-31 01:49:19 <Luke-Jr> if you're lucky, maybe it won't conflict <.<
43 2015-12-31 01:50:06 <sipa> Luke-Jr: alpha was 0.10
44 2015-12-31 01:50:20 <sipa> maybe 0.10.2 iirc
45 2015-12-31 01:50:24 <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, which commit fixed it? i'll put it in alpha
46 2015-12-31 01:50:42 <stevenroose_> got a bunch of conflicts on that merge :D
47 2015-12-31 01:50:44 <stevenroose_> but thanks
48 2015-12-31 01:50:52 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit: would be great!
49 2015-12-31 01:51:16 <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit:
50 2015-12-31 01:51:18 <Luke-Jr> | * | d6fc10c build: Use fPIC rather than fPIE for qt objects.
51 2015-12-31 01:51:19 <Luke-Jr> | * | f016923 build: Split hardening/fPIE options out
52 2015-12-31 01:51:20 <Luke-Jr> | * | f3995f0 build: fix building against qt5.4/5.5
53 2015-12-31 01:51:40 <Luke-Jr> but really, should just merge the entire branch to get the other fixes..
54 2015-12-31 01:52:02 <stevenroose_> there are like 15 conflicts, that's ok to review, right?
55 2015-12-31 01:52:19 <stevenroose_> of course I don't know how large the conflicts are :)
56 2015-12-31 01:53:33 <phantomcircuit> that's uh lots of conflicts
57 2015-12-31 01:55:48 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit: did you put the commit in alpha?
58 2015-12-31 01:56:01 <stevenroose_> or are you hesitating to do the whole merge?
59 2015-12-31 01:56:40 <Luke-Jr> I'm investigating the full merge FWIW
60 2015-12-31 01:56:45 <phantomcircuit> there's conflicts with just the one commit...
61 2015-12-31 01:57:00 <Luke-Jr> O.o
62 2015-12-31 01:57:02 <stevenroose_> does alpha follow bitcoin core in order to get fixes like this as they get into bitcoin#master?
63 2015-12-31 01:57:10 <Luke-Jr> I wonder if it makes sense to port the softforks
64 2015-12-31 01:57:22 <sipa> stevenroose_: we are planning to rebase alpha onto 0.12
65 2015-12-31 01:58:44 <stevenroose_> when is alpha due? Perhaps I can just wait untill then
66 2015-12-31 01:58:50 <stevenroose_> when is 0.12 due*
67 2015-12-31 01:59:18 <stevenroose_> 0.12 has 1 open issue
68 2015-12-31 01:59:23 <stevenroose_> :)
69 2015-12-31 02:00:41 <stevenroose_> it's a PR of Luke-Jr
70 2015-12-31 02:06:22 <stevenroose_> I got to go to sleep.. can anyone let me know if something related comes up? stevenroose@gmail.com
71 2015-12-31 02:06:26 <stevenroose_> thanks anyways!
72 2015-12-31 02:09:06 <Luke-Jr> mm, probably not worth the time to figure out the CLTV merge strategy
73 2015-12-31 03:12:11 <kanzure> Luke-Jr: re: versionbits bit allocation, i know this is slightly unrelated, but to your knowledge did anyone ever do a writeup of the bonded soft-fork deployment/activation concept?
74 2015-12-31 03:12:23 <Luke-Jr> dunno
75 2015-12-31 03:13:23 <kanzure> versionbit allocation can be logjammed if it's just by the bip number assigner :-/
76 2015-12-31 10:54:15 <jl2012> how does the 21 Bitcoin computer mining DRM work?
77 2015-12-31 10:55:20 <jl2012> they only allow sending reward to a specific address?
78 2015-12-31 11:12:07 <stevenroose_> phantomcircuit: Luke-Jr: what was the verdict on the merge?
79 2015-12-31 11:34:43 <BitsOfSkin> Hey guys
80 2015-12-31 22:22:15 <farhood> hi:)
81 2015-12-31 23:16:43 <paleh0rse> btci with bad data again? https://blockchain.info/charts/my-wallet-transaction-volume?timespan=30days&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
82 2015-12-31 23:17:16 <maaku> #bitcoin
83 2015-12-31 23:17:37 <paleh0rse> hey maaku
84 2015-12-31 23:17:55 <paleh0rse> just thought it was large enough anomoly to bring here
85 2015-12-31 23:18:00 <paleh0rse> or wizards
86 2015-12-31 23:41:49 <sipa> not impossible
87 2015-12-31 23:42:11 <sipa> but i don't have information to compare it with