1 2016-01-02 02:09:11 <ginseng> approximately how much memory does running a full node use?
 2 2016-01-02 02:12:16 <TD-Linux> ginseng, mine is currently using 730MB
 3 2016-01-02 02:13:00 <TD-Linux> but that includes the GUI
 4 2016-01-02 02:20:00 <ginseng> ok, i see. ty
 5 2016-01-02 02:37:53 <troj> Getting about 850MB, block chain is ~60GB.
 6 2016-01-02 02:38:02 <troj> @ginseng
 7 2016-01-02 05:52:07 <Lightsword> lol, so antpool is accidentially blockwitholding
 8 2016-01-02 05:52:54 <Lightsword> oddly enough it seems to act as selfish mining since btcchina and f2pool mine right on top of their headers
 9 2016-01-02 06:13:00 <petertodd> Lightsword: oh?!
10 2016-01-02 06:13:14 <petertodd> Lightsword: pretty much what I'd expect to happen...
11 2016-01-02 06:17:32 <Lightsword> antpool is so buggy
12 2016-01-02 06:18:06 <petertodd> Lightsword: looks like it's over now
13 2016-01-02 06:18:34 <Lightsword> maybe…could be a specific node bugged up
14 2016-01-02 06:18:46 <petertodd> Lightsword: or w/o peers
15 2016-01-02 06:18:59 <Lightsword> that is possible
16 2016-01-02 06:50:16 <GamerSg> Lightsword: How did u detect that they were selfish mining? I tot its not detectable
17 2016-01-02 06:50:48 <Lightsword> GamerSq, I monitor for stratum updates http://poolbench.antminer.link/
18 2016-01-02 06:51:03 <Lightsword> GamerSg, fyi it’s not intentional
19 2016-01-02 06:51:10 <Lightsword> GamerSg, it’s a bug with antpool
20 2016-01-02 06:51:23 <GamerSg> ic
21 2016-01-02 06:51:52 <GamerSg> so basically u measure the time diff btwn when their miners get new block headers vs when the network gets it?
22 2016-01-02 06:52:38 <Lightsword> GamerSg, I don’t monitor the network directly so much from the poolbench node
23 2016-01-02 06:53:00 <Lightsword> although I run two of the pools on it so I know those are close to when it hits relay network
24 2016-01-02 06:53:18 <GamerSg> i meant in general, not wrt to urself
25 2016-01-02 06:53:21 <Lightsword> well one right now I guess, my testpool isn’t online right now :P
26 2016-01-02 06:53:37 <Lightsword> but yeah I just watch blockheight using cgminer
27 2016-01-02 06:54:32 <GamerSg> ic
28 2016-01-02 06:56:25 <GamerSg> its kind of worrying to see that there are pools only reacting to new blocks after 30s
29 2016-01-02 06:59:00 <Lightsword> GamerSg, firewall of china really muchs up propagation, large blocks are slower as well
30 2016-01-02 06:59:51 <GamerSg> i suppose most miners alrdy SPV mine, 30s to get a block header?
31 2016-01-02 07:00:06 <Lightsword> SPV miners pick it up faster
32 2016-01-02 07:00:20 <Lightsword> only 3 do that though, f2pool btcchina and antpool
33 2016-01-02 07:00:30 <GamerSg> or even if they don't shldnt the relay network greatly reduce the time
34 2016-01-02 07:00:35 <Lightsword> and only 2 of those are reasonably reliable, f2pool and btcchina
35 2016-01-02 07:00:39 <Lightsword> antpool is super buggy
36 2016-01-02 07:00:57 <Lightsword> relay should help…still NFI if antpool is actually running it
37 2016-01-02 07:01:11 <GamerSg> that wld make sense if they are not on it
38 2016-01-02 07:01:56 <Lightsword> their setup is screwey
39 2016-01-02 07:02:26 <GamerSg> funny how they are the largest pool despite
40 2016-01-02 20:12:50 <Luke-Jr> Lightsword: uh, it doesn't make sense for a pool to block-withhold.. who are they withholding it from? block-withholding means miners holding back FROM the pool
41 2016-01-02 20:13:36 <Lightsword> Luke-Jr, woops mean selfish-mining
42 2016-01-02 20:13:41 <Lightsword> bleh, was tired