1 2016-01-23 04:17:10 <jimtendo> jimtendo
 2 2016-01-23 04:17:25 <jimtendo> ^ Ignore that. Was trying to do a Ctrl+F.
 3 2016-01-23 04:25:48 <qmm> is there a document describing the consensus rules all full nodes follow?
 4 2016-01-23 04:28:30 <Luke-Jr> qmm: yes, the Bitcoin Core source code
 5 2016-01-23 04:32:30 <jl2012> Is there any tool to sign a raw hash? giving a signature compatible to OP_CHECKSIG?
 6 2016-01-23 04:32:58 <qmm> Luke-Jr: would you be willing to point me to specific files for this?
 7 2016-01-23 04:33:32 <Luke-Jr> qmm: it's all over right now still
 8 2016-01-23 04:55:01 <qmm> Luke-Jr: it's not just in the https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/src/consensus directory? would you be willing to point me to another file or directory not in the consensus directory which is part of the consensus rules full nodes follow?
 9 2016-01-23 04:57:46 <jl2012> is RFC6979 in bitcoind 0.12?
10 2016-01-23 04:57:58 <jl2012> is RFC6979 default in bitcoind 0.12?
11 2016-01-23 05:06:17 <qmmm> still here, sorry about that
12 2016-01-23 05:31:55 <Luke-Jr> qmmmain.cpp for example
13 2016-01-23 08:54:25 <jonasschnelli> jl2012: yes. Bitcoin-core uses rfc6979 (https://github.com/bitcoin/secp256k1/blob/2bfb82b10edf0f0b0e366a12f94c8b21a914159d/src/secp256k1.c#L314)
14 2016-01-23 08:54:47 <jl2012> interesting....
15 2016-01-23 08:55:02 <jl2012> i have 2 signatures for the same thing
16 2016-01-23 08:55:13 <jl2012> they both claim they are RFC6979
17 2016-01-23 08:55:22 <jonasschnelli> jl2012: hah... very likely one is not. :)
18 2016-01-23 08:55:24 <jl2012> but not match