1 2016-02-05 04:56:07 <Luke-Jr> so I was thinking, in a post-segwit world where spending unconfirmed coins is safe..
 2 2016-02-05 04:56:20 <Luke-Jr> if you get double-spent, that of course means the people you paid are out of their money
 3 2016-02-05 04:56:29 <Luke-Jr> a well-written wallet ought to automatically re-issue the payment
 4 2016-02-05 04:56:37 <Luke-Jr> BUT, there is no way to actually do this securely :/
 5 2016-02-05 04:56:46 <Luke-Jr> since the chain could reorg back, and both txns would be valid..
 6 2016-02-05 04:57:12 <Luke-Jr> <blockhash> <height> OP_CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT maybe worth considering?
 7 2016-02-05 04:57:43 <aj> Luke-Jr: that'd sure making picking a side in a soft/hard fork trivial
 8 2016-02-05 04:57:57 <aj> a controversial fork i mean
 9 2016-02-05 04:58:07 <Luke-Jr> aj: heh, not what I was thinking of at all, but I guess so
10 2016-02-05 05:53:39 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: thats why bitcoin core tracks negative confirmations.
11 2016-02-05 05:53:51 <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: at some point the exclusion becomes sufficiently unconfirmed.
12 2016-02-05 05:54:10 <Luke-Jr> it'd be nicer (and faster) to not rely on that though
13 2016-02-05 06:45:23 <Luke-Jr> <jl2012@xbt.hk>: host smx4.web-hosting.com[209.188.21.38] said: 550 The sending
14 2016-02-05 06:45:25 <Luke-Jr> IP (192.3.11.21) is listed on https://spamrl.com/. Please resolve this and
15 2016-02-05 06:45:26 <Luke-Jr> retry. (in reply to end of DATA command)
16 2016-02-05 06:46:02 <Luke-Jr> oops, wrong tab (somehow..)
17 2016-02-05 15:49:51 <Chris_Stewart_5> does bitcoin use one's complement for numbering?
18 2016-02-05 18:19:11 <Lightsword> wondering…is the latest RC good enough to start using in production on mining pools at this time?
19 2016-02-05 18:51:54 <gijensen> Lightsword, I've been running RC2 for a while, just updated to RC3. If you have issues, you can't downgrade back to 0.11.2 because of chainstate obfuscation in 0.12 (I believe). It's up to you but if you're worried I'd wait until 0.12.0
20 2016-02-05 18:53:24 <gmaxwell> gijensen: if you don't start with 0.12 or reindex the chainstate will not be obfuscated.
21 2016-02-05 18:53:50 <gijensen> Oh okay, thanks. I didn't know that.
22 2016-02-05 22:27:56 <Squidicuz> stupid request; bitcoind should show some sort of warning when the hard drive is full?
23 2016-02-05 22:29:22 <phantomcircuit> Squidicuz, i thought we did
24 2016-02-05 22:29:42 <Squidicuz> me too?
25 2016-02-05 22:31:12 <gmaxwell> it does. but if it fills too fast it can run out before it can cleanly handle it.
26 2016-02-05 22:31:32 <Squidicuz> hmm. nevermind then.  must be something I am doing
27 2016-02-05 22:32:20 <Squidicuz> bitcoind is stored in /home/btd/  but the blocks are stored in /storage/blocks
28 2016-02-05 22:32:30 <Squidicuz> would it check both of those locations?
29 2016-02-05 22:33:34 <gmaxwell> It checkss the datadir location.
30 2016-02-05 22:33:44 <Squidicuz> ah
31 2016-02-05 22:36:22 <Squidicuz> okay. thanks guys.  looks like I need more hdds :)
32 2016-02-05 22:51:40 <moli> i tried to download the bc with v12rc2 on win7 but it stalled at "13 weeks behind", and the wallet froze up
33 2016-02-05 22:53:12 <helo> moli: anything interesting in debug.log?
34 2016-02-05 22:54:36 <moli> helo: i didn't see anything abnormal
35 2016-02-05 22:54:46 <moli> helo: is rc3 out yet?
36 2016-02-05 22:55:08 <moli> im thinking i'll try rc3 and if it still does the same thing i'll report
37 2016-02-05 22:56:07 <helo> moli: yes, see https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.12.0/test/
38 2016-02-05 22:56:34 <moli> helo: oh. thanks
39 2016-02-05 23:29:38 <denisx> 0.12.0rc3 builds and runs fine on freebsd
40 2016-02-05 23:30:27 <gmaxwell> denisx: woot.
41 2016-02-05 23:30:46 <gmaxwell> I always worry that late changes are going to break arches we don't have CI on.
42 2016-02-05 23:37:10 <Luke-Jr> would be nice to get BSD CI, but not sure if practical
43 2016-02-05 23:39:02 <TD-Linux> are you limited to the arches that Travis supports?
44 2016-02-05 23:39:17 <Luke-Jr> unless we can cross-compile or something, I think so
45 2016-02-05 23:40:04 <gmaxwell> run a vm in travis, of course.
46 2016-02-05 23:43:26 <Luke-Jr> lol
47 2016-02-05 23:43:48 <Luke-Jr> that might actually be practical