1 2016-02-19 14:01:45 <michagogo> If you do that, you can also put up the Linux bins
 2 2016-02-19 14:02:35 <timothy> thank you :)
 3 2016-02-19 14:03:42 <wumpus> but then it looks like we favor a certain OS michagogo
 4 2016-02-19 14:04:22 <michagogo> Put up a temporary README explaining that there's a delay in getting the others signed
 5 2016-02-19 14:05:43 <michagogo> You can explain in detail (Cory in HK until Monday), or not, but you can explain. And I think probably a large portion of Core users these days are on Linux...
 6 2016-02-19 14:05:45 <wumpus> and linux is also by far easiest to build from source
 7 2016-02-19 14:06:00 <michagogo> Good point.
 8 2016-02-19 14:27:01 <morcos> < wumpus> but then it looks like we favor a certain OS michagogo <--- we don't?
 9 2016-02-19 14:27:41 <wumpus> morcos: well yes we do :-)
10 2016-02-19 14:27:47 <paveljanik> we love Windows!
11 2016-02-19 14:31:02 <timothy> thank you cryptolocker?
12 2016-02-19 18:29:44 <Chris_Stewart_5> If I am using SIGHASH_SINGLE and the output that I am signing does NOT correspond to the input being signed do I just ignore that output?
13 2016-02-19 18:30:18 <Chris_Stewart_5> output that I am looking at* not signing.
14 2016-02-19 18:32:13 <Chris_Stewart_5> i'm talking about this piece of code https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/93c85d458ac3e2c496c1a053e1f5925f55e29100/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1079-L1085
15 2016-02-19 19:27:35 <Ademan> Other than the payment protocol, is there any other established mechanism for agreeing upon a "return address" for a given input? all outputs are predetermined, so it really needs to be on the input side, and it's ALL|ANYONECANPAY so secondary inputs doesn't really help
16 2016-02-19 19:27:50 <Ademan> pretty sure this isn't for #bitcoin , but if it is, just say so
17 2016-02-19 19:44:49 <Ademan> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1711 is the reasoning for allowing spending 0 value txouts that it cleans up the utxo set?
18 2016-02-19 19:47:29 <Ademan> In a way that's almost circular logic though, since if we disallowed spending 0 value txouts, then there'd be no need to retain them in the utxo set in the first place... except for applications that want to extract data
19 2016-02-19 21:19:32 <TZander> anyone here used pruning? With 0.12 I put 'prune=1000' in my bitcoin.config and after several hours my .bitcoin dir is 18GB...  Not what I expected.
20 2016-02-19 21:52:38 <sdaftuar> TZander: can you verify how much space is tied up in your blocks directory, and specifically tied up by your block and undo files (blocks/blk?????.dat and blocks/rev?????.dat) ?