1 2016-02-25 01:00:22 <denisx> building bitcoin 0.12 on freebsd works fine without any changes. but the bench_bitcoin throws Segmentation fault immediately
 2 2016-02-25 01:00:40 <denisx> trying it in gdb does not help and there is no usable backtrace
 3 2016-02-25 01:01:11 <denisx> test_bitcoin works also fine
 4 2016-02-25 03:36:47 <Lightsword> I’m seeing a live DoS attack on 0.12 where is the correct place to discuss that?
 5 2016-02-25 05:59:48 <raedah> why am I getting this error?  wallet/wallet.cpp:1098:38: error: ‘wtx’ was not declared in this scope  https://github.com/raedah/bitcoin/blob/listtransactions/src/wallet/wallet.cpp#L1098
 6 2016-02-25 06:18:22 <raedah> because I havent defined it or passed it to the function obviously, but where can I get wtx from?
 7 2016-02-25 07:05:34 <Luke-Jr> raedah: just remove wtx. from that line
 8 2016-02-25 07:05:45 <Luke-Jr> the code is on the object
 9 2016-02-25 11:08:42 <proslogion> Hello, I wonder if my understanding is correct, that the space saving from Schnorr would also apply to multi-input txs like CJ? thanks
10 2016-02-25 11:13:41 <Luke-Jr> proslogion: I believe it could, but only with some post-SW softforks
11 2016-02-25 11:14:49 <proslogion> Luke-Jr: that's what i meant, thanks
12 2016-02-25 17:37:26 <JackH> does all bitcoin software bind on port 8333? spv wallets too?
13 2016-02-25 17:41:32 <wumpus> everything that uses the P2P protocol; normal SPV wallets do, but electrum does not
14 2016-02-25 17:41:56 <wumpus> also SPV wallets never listen for incoming connections, there's no point
15 2016-02-25 17:43:54 <JackH> but they still have to download the block headers
16 2016-02-25 17:44:50 <gijensen> JackH, you don't have to bind the port to act as a client.
17 2016-02-25 17:45:12 <wumpus> yes, your use of 'bind' is ambigous
18 2016-02-25 17:46:23 <wumpus> binding is socket lingo for 'choose the endpoint', in the case of an outgoing connection that's generally not necessary, only when listing for incoming connections
19 2016-02-25 17:46:31 <wumpus> listening*
20 2016-02-25 17:47:14 <wumpus> SPV wallets such as android wallet just connect to a few nodes on port 8333, no binding involved
21 2016-02-25 17:47:30 <JackH> gotcha
22 2016-02-25 17:48:00 <wumpus> and electrum has a custom server/client protocol
23 2016-02-25 17:48:16 <JackH> I guess I should have said, listening, rather than binding
24 2016-02-25 17:48:45 <JackH> but yeah, certain SPV wallets connecting to a server could listen to whichever port they are made to listen to
25 2016-02-25 17:49:12 <wumpus> SPV wallets don't listen on a port, they don't have incoming connections
26 2016-02-25 17:49:27 <gijensen> If they're not serving anything there's no reason to
27 2016-02-25 17:49:32 <wumpus> right
28 2016-02-25 17:49:38 <wumpus> no one would *want* to connect to them
29 2016-02-25 18:01:35 <Michail1> Is there a reason why bitcoin doesn't drop the time from 10mins to 5mins instead of increasing the block size?
30 2016-02-25 18:02:02 <Michail1> Meaning, drop reward and time.
31 2016-02-25 18:04:56 <helo> that approach doesn't scale any better (probably worse) than increasing the block size
32 2016-02-25 18:05:14 <gijensen> IIRC that'd increase orphan rates even faster
33 2016-02-25 18:40:38 <wumpus> can someone else chair the meeting today? I can't be present the whole time
34 2016-02-25 18:47:04 <paveljanik> I can't be present at the beginning of the meeting :-(
35 2016-02-25 18:51:54 <petertodd> I'm here
36 2016-02-25 18:55:33 <jonasschnelli> here as well (is the meeting in #bitcoin-dev or #bitcoin-core-dev now?).
37 2016-02-25 18:55:51 <petertodd> jonasschnelli: the idea was that'd be discussed first on the mailing list IIRC
38 2016-02-25 18:56:18 <jonasschnelli> okay. Then better keep it in #bitcoin-dev for now
39 2016-02-25 18:58:58 <btcdrak> The bot was broken last week so we held it in #bitcoin-core-dev
40 2016-02-25 18:59:05 <petertodd> btcdrak: fair enough
41 2016-02-25 18:59:30 <jonasschnelli> #info (test)
42 2016-02-25 18:59:44 <btcdrak> you have to # startmeeting
43 2016-02-25 19:00:04 <jonasschnelli> #commands
44 2016-02-25 19:00:12 <jonasschnelli> (probably also needs a # startmeeting)
45 2016-02-25 19:00:42 <gmaxwell> #startmeeting
46 2016-02-25 19:00:48 <gmaxwell> seems broken.
47 2016-02-25 19:00:50 <btcdrak> it's broken :)
48 2016-02-25 19:00:54 <jonasschnelli> yes. Need to go to #bitcoin-core-dev
49 2016-02-25 19:00:57 <btcdrak> let's go to #bitcoin-core-dev
50 2016-02-25 19:00:57 <gmaxwell> k
51 2016-02-25 19:01:05 <petertodd> k