1 2016-03-22 00:15:58 <Chris_Stewart_5> I have a question about BIP66 and this test case inside of script_valid.json
 2 2016-03-22 00:16:10 <Chris_Stewart_5> [
 3 2016-03-22 00:16:12 <Chris_Stewart_5> "1",
 4 2016-03-22 00:16:14 <Chris_Stewart_5> "0x21 0x038282263212c609d9ea2a6e3e172de238d8c39cabd5ac1ca10646e23fd5f51508 CHECKSIG NOT",
 5 2016-03-22 00:16:16 <Chris_Stewart_5> "",
 6 2016-03-22 00:16:18 <Chris_Stewart_5> "BIP66 example 6, without DERSIG"
 7 2016-03-22 00:16:20 <Chris_Stewart_5> ],
 8 2016-03-22 00:16:37 <Chris_Stewart_5> BIP66 says that " if the signature does not pass the IsValidSignatureEncoding check below, the entire script evaluates to false immediately."
 9 2016-03-22 00:17:18 <Chris_Stewart_5> why would this script evaluate to true, "1" is an invalid signature and non DER compliant
10 2016-03-22 00:17:22 <Chris_Stewart_5> shouldn't it fail immediately?
11 2016-03-22 12:10:13 <thermoman> HELP. just upgraded a btc-core 0.11.2 node to 0.12.0 - now with 0.12.0 running, balance of single accounts doesn't match the accounts balance from before upgrade. total balance (getinfo) is the same
12 2016-03-22 12:10:47 <thermoman> can't find anything related in the changelogs
13 2016-03-22 12:13:23 <thermoman> w
14 2016-03-22 12:15:31 <jouke> thermoman: does your wallet  contain transactions that were doublespend?
15 2016-03-22 12:16:17 <jouke> thermoman: nm, don't know if that's related.
16 2016-03-22 12:16:21 <jouke> We had some issues with that.
17 2016-03-22 12:17:44 <thermoman> i'm running with -rescan right now. there are many AddToWallet lines logged to debug.log with some few "Transaction ... (in block ...) conflicts with wallet transaction ... (both spend ...)"
18 2016-03-22 12:18:37 <thermoman> we had issues with malleability way back
19 2016-03-22 12:19:14 <jouke> Where an earlier wallet would set conflicting transactions to zero confirmations, while the .12 wallet would set it to minus the number of blocks since it was double spent.
20 2016-03-22 12:23:28 <morcos> thermoman: unfortunately account balances have lots of problems and aren't really supported.  This was true before 0.12.
21 2016-03-22 12:24:12 <thermoman> morcos: I know, I know
22 2016-03-22 12:24:13 <morcos> In addtion, for total balance reporting, 0.12 contained a change and a bug in the way unconfirmed balances are reported
23 2016-03-22 12:24:29 <thermoman> legacy shit that has to be supported...
24 2016-03-22 12:25:13 <morcos> This should only affect unconfirmed balances, it may be helped by running rescan, but it might not solve all problems.  particularly transactions where a parent non-wallet tranasaction was double spent
25 2016-03-22 12:25:22 <thermoman> morcos: can you give me a link to the bug report?
26 2016-03-22 12:26:24 <morcos> See PR #7715 for the fix
27 2016-03-22 12:26:49 <morcos> But it does not fix any problems with account balances, which are probably also made worse in 0.12 (maybe only for unconfirmed account balances, i'm not sure)
28 2016-03-22 12:27:38 <thermoman> thanks
29 2016-03-22 13:35:32 <thermoman> morcos, jouke: after the rescan most accounts have the right amount, only a few have very little discrepancies.
30 2016-03-22 23:07:43 <bitanarchy> my trezor with firmware 1.3.5 just hang on the word apology... would this be a problem with the trezor hw, the trezor firmware or the computer software?