1 2016-05-01 04:34:28 <rusty> kanzure, btcdrak: So, re: Kristov's post.  Seems a bit disingenous (he could surely measure this himself, and describing segwit as a "subsidy" leaves a taste of reddit in my mouth) but tempted to let it through.
 2 2016-05-01 12:02:05 <kanzure> rusty: yeah it's a tough call. btcdrak and i haven't figured out whether to let that through...
 3 2016-05-01 14:42:34 <kanzure> https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=block_map_get
 4 2016-05-01 14:42:36 <kanzure> what?
 5 2016-05-01 14:44:31 <kanzure> maybe this is the ccan stuff?
 6 2016-05-01 14:44:53 <kanzure> e.g. https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/tree/f4e94147a7281ec05e078ff9f3e6d65893417bad/ccan/ccan
 7 2016-05-01 15:20:34 <kanzure> we should coerce rusty into giving an overview of his source code. where's the serialization?
 8 2016-05-01 17:26:02 <Lucifer333> hi, this function is failing, it is returning '0'     EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name(NID_secp256k1);
 9 2016-05-01 17:26:10 <Lucifer333> anyone else had this problem?
10 2016-05-01 18:15:33 <luke-jr> Lucifer333: typically that means a broken OpenSSL I think; but must be old code, as we don't use that anymore?
11 2016-05-01 18:16:01 <luke-jr> (and if you're talking about some altcoin nonsense, get out of here with it - maybe ##altcoin-dev)
12 2016-05-01 18:41:34 <Lucifer333> I have 2 different bitcoin clients failing on this function,
13 2016-05-01 18:41:40 <Lucifer333> bitc and picocoin
14 2016-05-01 18:41:51 <Lucifer333> so i think this is an ssl library thing
15 2016-05-01 18:42:20 <Lucifer333> what version do you need these days, I am on 1.0 OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
16 2016-05-01 18:42:38 <Lucifer333> can someone give me feedback as to what openssl is needed?
17 2016-05-01 18:43:55 <Lucifer333> hi, this function is failing, it is returning '0'     EC_KEY_new_by_curve_name(NID_secp256k1)
18 2016-05-01 18:44:57 <arubi> wow, don't use that key!
19 2016-05-01 18:49:30 <Lucifer333> arubi, dont troll
20 2016-05-01 18:49:46 <Lucifer333> anyone else, had this same problem?
21 2016-05-01 18:50:02 <arubi> Lucifer333, I'm not, just kindly telling you to ask #openssl :)
22 2016-05-01 18:50:57 <Lucifer333> did, this is api call is bitcoin related, so relevant here in dev
23 2016-05-01 18:51:26 <Lucifer333> for a dev channel its pretty quiet here
24 2016-05-01 18:53:27 <arubi> Lucifer333, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021898  .
25 2016-05-01 18:54:15 <phantomcircuit> Lucifer333, i doubt you'll get ecc in fips releases form 2013
26 2016-05-01 18:54:18 <phantomcircuit> from*
27 2016-05-01 19:09:59 <Lucifer333> phantomcircuit, ok so the problem is getting openssl-1.0.2d-2 on my system
28 2016-05-01 19:10:04 <Lucifer333> centos repo issue
29 2016-05-01 19:10:08 <Lucifer333> (i am on centos)
30 2016-05-01 19:29:21 <Lucifer333> phantomcircuit, what is the solution for centos
31 2016-05-01 19:30:19 <Lucifer333> [jacobbogers@PC2 lib]$
32 2016-05-01 19:30:19 <Lucifer333> [jacobbogers@PC2 lib]$ openssl ecparam -list_curves
33 2016-05-01 19:30:19 <Lucifer333> prime256v1: X9.62/SECG curve over a 256 bit prime field
34 2016-05-01 19:30:19 <Lucifer333> secp384r1 : NIST/SECG curve over a 384 bit prime field
35 2016-05-01 19:30:19 <Lucifer333> secp521r1 : NIST/SECG curve over a 521 bit prime field
36 2016-05-01 19:30:40 <Lucifer333> I dont have secp256k1
37 2016-05-01 19:39:43 <luke-jr> Lucifer333: the solution is to not use CentOS or not use non-standard node software
38 2016-05-01 23:27:17 <phantomcircuit> Lucifer333: don't use centos?
39 2016-05-01 23:28:18 <phantomcircuit> afaik there is no safe way to build bitcoin on centos
40 2016-05-01 23:28:30 <phantomcircuit> you more or less have to use the gitian binaries
41 2016-05-01 23:29:11 <phantomcircuit> ie https://bitcoin.org/en/download