1 2016-07-20 01:54:30 <azariah> is there a list of common / allocated BIP44 account numbers? thinking about what to use to avoid potential collision w existing HD wallets
 2 2016-07-20 02:01:49 <achow101> join #btct-ad-group
 3 2016-07-20 02:02:25 <achow101> oops. ignore that.  forgot my backslash
 4 2016-07-20 08:29:23 <nazarewk> is there some way to check if txout is spendable without actually spending it?
 5 2016-07-20 10:41:49 <waxwing> nazarewk: that seems like a question that has a bunch of different answers depending on exactly what you mean; in the simplest case, you could create a redeeming transaction, have your node verify it but not broadcast it
 6 2016-07-20 10:42:08 <waxwing> if it's an output requiring a hash preimage, maybe it's spendable, depends on if anyone has a pre-image
 7 2016-07-20 10:42:27 <waxwing> then there are outputs that are provably unspendable, i think. all depends on the scriptPubKey right.
 8 2016-07-20 11:28:11 <rafalcpp> Hello. Anyone here familiar with rebuildig bitcoin in gitian? The process documented in git ( https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/gitian-building.md  ) does not work for me
 9 2016-07-20 11:30:13 <rafalcpp> First of, the  `make-base-vm --lxc --arch amd64 --suite trusty`   creates a file named "base-trusty-amd64" while the gbuild tries to open same file but + ".qcow2".  Also, gbuild can not reach the image (testing via SSH).
10 2016-07-20 11:37:26 <rafalcpp> hm perhaps make-base creates it in raw format, while gbuild expects qcow2... anyone?
11 2016-07-20 13:24:25 <nazarewk> is there some database of pubkeyscripts?
12 2016-07-20 13:24:40 <nazarewk> i want to make pretty much any non-standard transaction on my testnet
13 2016-07-20 13:28:45 <Chris_Stewart_5> nazarewk: You will have to create your own scripts with your own public keys or custom script that contains the logic you want to follow
14 2016-07-20 13:35:01 <nazarewk> i wonder what happens to locktime transaction before it is accepted into blockchain?
15 2016-07-20 13:54:08 <achow101> nazarewk: it remains unconfirmed
16 2016-07-20 13:58:57 <nazarewk> so is it like inside blockchain, but not yet confirmed?
17 2016-07-20 14:00:16 <achow101> no, it is in the mempools of many nodes. It can be dropped ("forgotten") at any time. The transaction is not in the blockchain until it is past the timelock