1 2016-09-12 04:26:52 <scar> i recently updated to version 0.13.0-precise3 from the Ubuntu PPA, and now there's no bitcoin binary... the changelog says it was replace with a "dummy package due to https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6198" which is a 5-year old bug?  confused...
 2 2016-09-12 04:28:46 <sipa> scar: bitcoin 0.13 no longer supports ubuntu 12.04
 3 2016-09-12 04:29:30 <sipa> because the compiler in 12.04 is too old to compile it
 4 2016-09-12 04:30:08 <sipa> either compile it yourself after installing a gcc backport, use the release binaries which are statically compiled insyead of the ppa, or upgrade ubuntu
 5 2016-09-12 04:33:37 <scar> sipa, wheres the release binaries?
 6 2016-09-12 04:35:00 <sipa> bitcoin.org
 7 2016-09-12 04:35:30 <scar> im there on the download page
 8 2016-09-12 04:35:43 <scar> in the tar.gz file?
 9 2016-09-12 04:42:57 <sipa> pick the one for your os
10 2016-09-12 04:55:20 <scar> i guess its pretty safe to update to 14.04 now... having audio problems too for some reason
11 2016-09-12 13:00:07 <rafalcpp> In Gitian, how would you tell it to "build the curren version of code, the one that I have here now"? (it is commited to proper repository so Gitian can fetch it inside LXC)?
12 2016-09-12 13:03:31 <TZander> rafalcpp: use the --commit bitcoin=SHA1 argument
13 2016-09-12 13:05:58 <rafalcpp> thanks TZander. Btw Gitian itself verifies git signs? In abscence of git-tag sign on that commit will it instead check if all commits (since last signed tag) are signed? Or is the person starting gitian supposed to?
14 2016-09-12 13:08:04 <TZander> gitian doesn't do stuff there.
15 2016-09-12 13:11:58 <rafalcpp> thanks
16 2016-09-12 13:13:27 <jonasschnelli> rafalcpp: If you build with gitian, the git signatures are not really of importance (only if you want to track down why your gitian signatures are different then others)
17 2016-09-12 13:15:27 <rafalcpp> jonasschnelli: oh right (since trusted community already builds)
18 2016-09-12 18:24:24 <ShapeShifter499> Hi
19 2016-09-12 18:24:46 <ShapeShifter499> what's the difference between master and 0.13 in the GitHub repo?
20 2016-09-12 18:24:57 <sipa> all work for 0.14
21 2016-09-12 18:25:09 <sipa> 0.13 only gets bugfixes
22 2016-09-12 18:25:19 <sipa> but all work is done on top master
23 2016-09-12 18:26:47 <ShapeShifter499> sipa: I'm just trying to figure out which is most current code to use for my AUR package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-git/
24 2016-09-12 18:27:16 <ShapeShifter499> so stay on master then if I want to point this package at the most recent code there is
25 2016-09-12 18:27:31 <sipa> master is not released code
26 2016-09-12 18:27:52 <sipa> you shouldn't use it for production
27 2016-09-12 18:28:04 <ShapeShifter499> sipa: that's why there is a -git tag
28 2016-09-12 18:28:27 <ShapeShifter499> people are supposed to know it's the latest code out there
29 2016-09-12 18:30:40 <achow101> ShapeShifter499: All of the releases are tagged
30 2016-09-12 18:34:39 <ShapeShifter499> Alright
31 2016-09-12 18:40:12 <sipa> what is AUR btw?
32 2016-09-12 18:41:21 <achow101> sipa: Archlinux User Repository. I think they're basically ppa's but for arch
33 2016-09-12 18:42:03 <sipa> ah
34 2016-09-12 18:44:23 <ShapeShifter499> sipa: sort of
35 2016-09-12 18:44:51 <ShapeShifter499> achow101: sipa their just a bunch of clever scripts that fetch everything you need to compile whatever package
36 2016-09-12 18:44:56 <ShapeShifter499> *they
37 2016-09-12 18:45:03 <ShapeShifter499> *they're
38 2016-09-12 18:45:12 <ShapeShifter499> fail type
39 2016-09-12 18:53:22 <TZander> ShapeShifter499: let us know if your scripts are working and online, would be interesting to use it for other git repos of bitcoin as well.
40 2016-09-12 18:54:01 <ShapeShifter499> TZander: other git repos of bitcoin?
41 2016-09-12 18:54:27 <ShapeShifter499> I'm not exactly sure what you mean
42 2016-09-12 18:54:28 <TZander> yes, forks.
43 2016-09-12 18:54:33 <TZander> github forks.
44 2016-09-12 18:54:38 <ShapeShifter499> TZander: classic?
45 2016-09-12 18:54:54 <TZander> sure, that would work
46 2016-09-12 18:55:18 <ShapeShifter499> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-classic-git/
47 2016-09-12 18:55:18 <TZander> ShapeShifter499: would that work?
48 2016-09-12 18:55:38 <TZander> oh... :)
49 2016-09-12 18:55:51 <ShapeShifter499> I'm still not sure what your trying to do though, this is a Arch Linux specific method
50 2016-09-12 18:56:18 <ShapeShifter499> or really anything with pacman as the package manager
51 2016-09-12 18:56:55 <TZander> I think its useful to have such packages, for users. I'll bookmark this one. I notice it missed the latest release.
52 2016-09-12 18:57:53 <TZander> ShapeShifter499: thanks for the link!
53 2016-09-12 18:58:02 <ShapeShifter499> TZander: just go to the AUR and search for bitcoin, there are loads
54 2016-09-12 19:02:57 <ShapeShifter499> Hold up
55 2016-09-12 19:03:12 <ShapeShifter499> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-core-git/   ha someone else already updated a similar package
56 2016-09-12 19:03:26 <ShapeShifter499> I guess I'll ask for mine to be removed
57 2016-09-12 19:04:20 <ShapeShifter499> TZander: you might want to remove my link and instead link the one I just posted. More updated scripts
58 2016-09-12 19:48:14 <ShapeShifter499> TZander: I just noticed his was a "headless" install, no QT client so I'll go ahead and update mine