1 2016-11-29 02:52:43 <luke-jr> CodeShark: ping
 2 2016-11-29 09:46:26 <CodeShark> luke-jr: high latency pong
 3 2016-11-29 09:46:37 <luke-jr> CodeShark: see BIP 123 PR
 4 2016-11-29 09:47:34 <CodeShark> #447?
 5 2016-11-29 09:47:49 <CodeShark> Err 477
 6 2016-11-29 10:26:23 <luke-jr> CodeShark: yeah
 7 2016-11-29 12:39:06 <coin_trader> hey all - is there a link for ubuntu server instructions for new version of bitcoin core? the instructions on the .org site are kinda old (v11) and don't go over anything regarding use of HD wallets and/or block pruning... when doing the usual 'apt-add-repository' command, it complains about using official binaries and not launchpad/ppa.....
 8 2016-11-29 12:47:15 <luke-jr> coin_trader: #bitcoin
 9 2016-11-29 15:01:12 <mryandao> hi there, i noticed that the Misbehaving ban score that used to apply for mempool messages was removed. When I last checked, it was prevalent in v0.12
10 2016-11-29 15:02:40 <mryandao> when I last asked about the reasoning for introducing the ban score, it was to prohibit surveillence nodes from hurting privacy, but now that its gone, what's stopping surveillence nodes from spamming the `mempool` message?
11 2016-11-29 15:20:55 <jonasschnelli> mryandao: reasonable question.
12 2016-11-29 15:21:10 <jonasschnelli> But since 0.13, the mempool message can be disabled
13 2016-11-29 15:21:18 <jonasschnelli> (when disabling bloom filter)
14 2016-11-29 15:22:40 <mryandao> jonasschnelli: is that default core policy? if there's no bloom filter
15 2016-11-29 15:22:49 <jonasschnelli> Nono..
16 2016-11-29 15:22:52 <jonasschnelli> It's optional.
17 2016-11-29 15:23:18 <mryandao> jonasschnelli: thanks for clearing that up ;)
18 2016-11-29 15:23:22 <jonasschnelli> np
19 2016-11-29 15:29:14 <stevenroose> jonasschnelli, so you either dont reply to mempool messages or you are unprotected against surveillance nodes?
20 2016-11-29 15:29:50 <stevenroose> Why would the availability of the option to disable mempool messages be an argument to no longer punish bad mempool message behavior?
21 2016-11-29 15:30:52 <mryandao> the NSA probably knows what's up without abusing mempool messages
22 2016-11-29 15:32:14 <jonasschnelli> stevenroose: disabling the mempool command hurts SPV wallets.
23 2016-11-29 15:32:32 <jonasschnelli> IMO thats the only reason to keep the mempool command on by default.
24 2016-11-29 15:32:54 <jonasschnelli> If all nodes disabled it, SPV wallets can't (really) detect 0 confs.
25 2016-11-29 15:33:11 <jonasschnelli> (which is utterly insecure anyways)
26 2016-11-29 16:36:42 <moli> jonasschnelli, how can we disable the mempool messaging?
27 2016-11-29 16:58:52 <moli> oh i just saw your PR, thanks, jonasschnelli