1 2017-01-11 18:20:38 <luke-jr> morcos: c0507f800475edf003adb744061d864741d3ee12796834d4d7f9a72b0bbd4fe6 is the only one of those that doesn't show up in my debug.log
 2 2017-01-11 18:20:43 <luke-jr> err, that DOES
 3 2017-01-11 18:20:50 <luke-jr> 2017-01-10 21:23:32 not keeping orphan with rejected parents c0507f800475edf003adb744061d864741d3ee1279
 4 2017-01-11 18:21:40 <luke-jr> 2017-01-10 21:23:32 d97b0571f984420ffebb8f4e69e3d1ed1467797105ad602747ff1ddff322ff40 from peer=14 was not accepted: bad-txns-inputs-spent (code 18)
 5 2017-01-11 18:21:46 <luke-jr> (that's a parent)
 6 2017-01-11 18:22:25 <luke-jr> looks like a double-spend?
 7 2017-01-11 18:23:11 <luke-jr> so the competing parent probably had enough fee for the mempool, but not enough to be mined, and d97b0571f9 didn't have enough more to replace it
 8 2017-01-11 23:11:57 <moeadham> Hey folks. A lot of people use Bitcoind for enterprise use but; isn't well suited for certain situations. We are interested in gauging interest in a more enterprise solution we have built internally (think Bitgo + Bitpay where you control keys, it creates transactions and manages inputs). If you have run into any of these problems, please ping me and I can send you a survey to fill out. Thanks!
 9 2017-01-11 23:30:24 <Lightsword> moeadham, what sort of API does it have?
10 2017-01-11 23:32:29 <moeadham> Pretty fully featured. you give it a set of xpubs and it works to always have a set of confirmed inputs in your wallet (for sending coins). On the "receiving" coins side, it has an api to generate a new address for a specific payment. Then it monitors the address, notifies on transaction & confirm. You can also give it xprv's and it can co-sign your transactions. Its a pretty bit product to be honest.
11 2017-01-11 23:39:04 <Lightsword> moeadham, is it being planned as a centralized service or something self hosted?
12 2017-01-11 23:40:25 <moeadham> So, we have had it in production for 2 years for out internal services (we process a lot of transactions). It runs on the cloud for high availability. For certain businesses we could do an on-prem solution. It is very much "centralized", in the sense that, it has an excellent DB and is made for people who need a reliable way to transact their own coins.
13 2017-01-11 23:40:50 <Lightsword> https://github.com/ciphrex/CoinSocket is something we’re working on integration with right now, and it is self hosted
14 2017-01-11 23:41:05 <moeadham> Is that important to you?
15 2017-01-11 23:41:14 <Lightsword> yes
16 2017-01-11 23:42:17 <moeadham> Interesting. What else is important? Do you have a rough figure of how many transactions you process? (ex. queuing, input management, segregated accounts, etc)
17 2017-01-11 23:47:50 <Lightsword> moeadham, not a huge amount of transactions yet…but I don’t think it should have any issues there even at high volume since it’s a c++ backend, it has multiple account capability and multisig, and its got a pubsub style websocket api which is nice
18 2017-01-11 23:49:05 <Lightsword> is what you’re trying to do all that different from bitgo? I think they let you control your keys as well
19 2017-01-11 23:49:19 <moeadham> Lightsword it is not so much the speed of the software, but how intelligently it queues transactions, splits change, etc, to ensure you always have a set of confirmed inputs, etc.
20 2017-01-11 23:50:07 <moeadham> I would say it has a lot of similarities to Bitgo. We built it internally before Bitgo existed, and it has evolved significantly since (it processes incoming transactions somewhat different to how BitGo does). Do you think there is a need for an alternative to Bitgo?
21 2017-01-11 23:52:09 <Lightsword> moeadham, I think there’s a need for a good self hosted multisig wallet backend system with good security and flexibility
22 2017-01-11 23:56:20 <Lightsword> moeadham, the biggest issue right now I think is that there aren’t many good self hosted wallet backends available that are easy to use and that make it easy to do best practice security such as integrated cold storage management multisig and configurable policy
23 2017-01-11 23:58:14 <Lightsword> right now it seems most exchanges that have decent self hosted wallets have heavially customized systems where the wallets are tightly coupled with their infactructure