1 2017-03-15 00:28:07 <cluelessperson> Is there a BIP for a default FEE formula?
 2 2017-03-15 00:30:01 <luke-jr> cluelessperson: no, that's not really BIP material
 3 2017-03-15 00:30:17 <luke-jr> BIPs are for standards across implementations, but implementations may offer fees based on any criteria they like
 4 2017-03-15 00:30:28 <luke-jr> (and miners may accept them on any criteria as well)
 5 2017-03-15 00:30:51 <cluelessperson> luke-jr: well the formula would work on any implenentation I would think
 6 2017-03-15 00:31:10 <luke-jr> implementations can share code/logic as they want, but there's no need for them to do so
 7 2017-03-15 00:33:22 <cluelessperson> luke-jr: I think it'd be a good idea to have a standard formula for all wallets by default
 8 2017-03-15 00:33:36 <cluelessperson> hide it from users more
 9 2017-03-15 00:35:21 <cluelessperson> luke-jr: basically, it's occurring often, with every wallet, where a user uses a default fee and it doesn't work well for them
10 2017-03-15 13:47:16 <arubi> so bip42 is "Unanimously Recommended for implementation" ?  sweet :)
11 2017-03-15 18:15:54 <cluelessperson> hi all
12 2017-03-15 23:21:41 <xmlnewbi> Im trying to use fundrawtransaction, however it keeps returning "Insufficient funds" even though I have .1 btc in here and its a small tx
13 2017-03-15 23:21:54 <xmlnewbi> is there a differnt reason it would return that?