1 2017-07-20 00:37:48 <phantomcircuit> Mad7Scientist, -reindex will ignore blocks with bad checksums
 2 2017-07-20 00:37:59 <phantomcircuit> it leaves the data there but you download the block again
 3 2017-07-20 00:38:13 <phantomcircuit> also yeah generally external hdds are crap quality
 4 2017-07-20 02:31:29 <Mad7Scientist> phantomcircuit, removing it revealed that it's refurbished Maxtor 300GB
 5 2017-07-20 10:36:01 <waxwing> i kept meaning to ask here, does anyone know what the current expected approach is for bip39/44 wallets w.r.t segwit? P2sh/p2wpkh presumably, but what about bip32 paths?
 6 2017-07-20 12:09:26 <instagibbs> waxwing, no standard outisde of maybe BIP49
 7 2017-07-20 12:09:30 <instagibbs> afaik
 8 2017-07-20 12:09:40 <waxwing> oh another bip, cool!
 9 2017-07-20 12:10:23 <instagibbs> not sure it has more than minimal support... I don't understand why wallet devs arent coordinating on a new standard :)
10 2017-07-20 12:10:58 <waxwing> right i should probably be investigating like trezor and so on. does seem like it would be nice if some people had decided.
11 2017-07-20 12:12:09 <waxwing> i agree with that bip in as much as i came to the conclusion it's less confusing to use a different branch. so they're going with 49' .. seems logical.
12 2017-07-20 12:12:22 <instagibbs> not the worst idea I guess
13 2017-07-20 12:12:56 <waxwing> also further highlights that this stuff should not be in BIP, or at least should be a different "branch" of BIP
14 2017-07-20 12:13:08 <waxwing> since bitcoin developers need have zero interest in it.
15 2017-07-20 13:05:29 <waxwing> instagibbs: thanks for the twitter ping, i feel like, ask 10 wallet developers and get 15 different opinions :)
16 2017-07-20 13:13:00 <takinbo> clear
17 2017-07-20 14:29:41 <instagibbs> waxwing, I was thinking of asking 10 to get 15 :)
18 2017-07-20 14:29:49 <instagibbs> oh whoops, transposed numbers :P
19 2017-07-20 15:10:39 <adiabat> waxwing: address derivation standards are, unfortunately, all over the palce
20 2017-07-20 15:11:26 <instagibbs> I tell users to never assume a wallet can be recovered cross-platform unless explicit support is given
21 2017-07-20 15:11:50 <adiabat> there's a compatibility matrix linked here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1000544.0
22 2017-07-20 15:21:59 <instagibbs> for the most part BIP44 seems to work well
23 2017-07-20 15:25:32 <adiabat> I like bip44, I think a lot of the incompatibility may be path dependence where wallets already set up their own thing before bip44 was really established
24 2017-07-20 15:26:15 <instagibbs> yes for sure, you can't willy-nilly switch out from underneath
25 2017-07-20 16:22:32 <moeadham> Hey folks. Anyone know of a testnet segwit transaction that has more than one input I can take a look at?
26 2017-07-20 17:33:18 <adiabat> moeadham: faa8a228740f7ad091870c88c9b5041489ace83624c49f66174479f6576573cc
27 2017-07-20 17:33:27 <adiabat> has 507 inputs
28 2017-07-20 18:54:10 <moeadham> thanks adiabat
29 2017-07-20 19:15:53 <dgenr8> adiabat: you and your path independence