1 2017-08-27 04:31:18 <ossifrage> Any ideas why the 0.15.0rc2 useragent is /Satoshi:0.15.0/ instead of /Satoshi:0.15.0rc2/?
 2 2017-08-27 14:09:24 <kanzure> bitcoind tech support questions should not be sent to bitcoin-dev mailing list, right? trying to figure out where to direct this email (in modqueue) to.
 3 2017-08-27 17:31:15 <gustavonalle> I’m connecting a miner to bitcoind in regtest mode for testing purposes and the miner is sending {"method": "getblocktemplate", "params": [{"capabilities": ["coinbasetxn", "coinbasevalue", "longpoll", "workid"], "rules": ["segwit"]}], "id":0}  but bitcoind returns error 500, I suppose this miner is broken?
 4 2017-08-27 17:32:03 <gustavonalle> or is the request correct?
 5 2017-08-27 18:28:28 <brand0> what version of protoc is bitcoin core compat with?
 6 2017-08-27 18:31:51 <brand0> looks like 2.x branch
 7 2017-08-27 22:07:45 <ginseng> how was 550 decided as the minimum block count for pruned blockchains?
 8 2017-08-27 22:08:27 <ginseng> i also notice that if i set prune=550, my testnet blockchain is 1.7G but if i manually run pruneblockchain i can get it down to 1.3G. Is 550 not the minimum?
 9 2017-08-27 22:16:00 <cncr04s> you still need the full transaction output set
10 2017-08-27 22:31:06 <ginseng> cncr04s: are you saying that a pruned blockchain is not functional as a node? isn't it just limited by its ability to retrieve information from 550+ blocks ago
11 2017-08-27 22:31:16 <ginseng> it can still validate new transactions
12 2017-08-27 23:05:24 <brand0> does anybody here develop using arch linux?
13 2017-08-27 23:05:49 <brand0> i'm having trouble with linking protobuf in bitcoin-qt
14 2017-08-27 23:37:03 <ginseng> are you building protobuf from source or using a package?