1 2017-09-10 17:12:49 <dviola> hi, I just saw this:
 2 2017-09-10 17:12:51 <dviola> 2017-09-10 17:12:14 Imported mempool transactions from disk: 11486 successes, 36 failed, 0 expired
 3 2017-09-10 17:12:53 <dviola> 36 failed?
 4 2017-09-10 17:16:21 <dviola> is that anything to be worried about?
 5 2017-09-10 17:16:36 <arubi> probably got into a block while you were offline
 6 2017-09-10 17:16:45 <arubi> or double spent or w/e :)
 7 2017-09-10 17:17:47 <dviola> arubi: oh
 8 2017-09-10 17:18:09 <dviola> 2017-09-10 17:16:58 Imported mempool transactions from disk: 10101 successes, 83 failed, 0 expired
 9 2017-09-10 17:18:15 <dviola> hrmm
10 2017-09-10 17:21:05 <dviola> I don't completely understand, maybe because I don't understand what the mempool is
11 2017-09-10 17:21:22 <arubi> it's a pile of transactions you know about but are not in a block yet
12 2017-09-10 17:21:55 <dviola> oh
13 2017-09-10 17:23:58 <dviola> arubi: the failed transaction just means that those transactions didn't get into my mempool?
14 2017-09-10 17:24:07 <dviola> because I was offline or something
15 2017-09-10 17:25:01 <arubi> you had them, but they can't go back into your mempool now because they are either already in a block or double spent
16 2017-09-10 17:25:10 <dviola> oh
17 2017-09-10 17:25:25 <dviola> I see, thanks
18 2017-09-10 17:25:34 <arubi> np
19 2017-09-10 17:26:12 <dviola> in that case, my bitcoind will just release them from the mempool?
20 2017-09-10 17:26:28 <arubi> it'll just not load them
21 2017-09-10 17:26:57 <dviola> I see
22 2017-09-10 17:27:38 <dviola> neat
23 2017-09-10 17:34:13 <esotericnonsense> dviola: as far as i'm aware it's just written with the contents of your mempool on a clean shutdown
24 2017-09-10 17:34:18 <esotericnonsense> and re-imported on load
25 2017-09-10 17:34:52 <esotericnonsense> when it's written i think it just overwrites or deletes the old file entirely
26 2017-09-10 17:38:26 <dviola> I see, thanks
27 2017-09-10 22:07:13 <esotericnonsense> does anyone know if sites like bitcoinwisdom/cryptowat.ch use off the shelf charting libraries or if they're handrolled?
28 2017-09-10 22:07:39 <esotericnonsense> i'm shopping for charts, C3.js looks pretty good http://c3js.org
29 2017-09-10 22:11:22 <esotericnonsense> plotly looks tasty as well. hm
30 2017-09-10 22:28:23 <dugo> esotericnonsense: ask around in #bitcoin-pricetalk
31 2017-09-10 22:28:45 <esotericnonsense> i've decided to play around with c3 now, as long as it's 'good enough' that's fine, chartist is annoying me
32 2017-09-10 22:29:07 <esotericnonsense> it seems the library is designed for basic mini-charts
33 2017-09-10 22:40:21 <ossifrage> esotericnonsense, https://cryptowat.ch/about/technical says the charts are custom ontop of canvas with small parts of d3
34 2017-09-10 22:45:14 <esotericnonsense> thanks ossifrage
35 2017-09-10 22:45:31 <esotericnonsense> c3.js looks to be absolutely perfect for what i need, just hoping the performance is sufficient when i load all the points in
36 2017-09-10 22:45:35 <esotericnonsense> (c3 is built on d3)
37 2017-09-10 22:47:11 <ossifrage> Just don't do whatever Johoe's Mempool Stats does which causes chrome to use 1GB of gpu memory and then crash out the gpu thread if I leave it running
38 2017-09-10 22:47:24 <esotericnonsense> ossifrage: i just fixed a bug in my own site that was causing that LOL
39 2017-09-10 22:48:13 <esotericnonsense> ossifrage: you've probably seen it, but https://esotericnonsense.com - it's similar to johoe's but does a bit less atm
40 2017-09-10 22:48:28 <esotericnonsense> maybe it won't kill your browser... (maybe it will)
41 2017-09-10 22:49:37 <esotericnonsense> WARNING: URLs may contain browser-eating MALWARE! etc
42 2017-09-10 22:49:49 <ossifrage> I started playing with writing a spam detector but got bored with the frontend visualization crap (very much not a web dev) and stopped working on it
43 2017-09-10 22:50:53 <esotericnonsense> i'm kind of at the medium point now where i think i've spent probably 1/3 of my time on frontend, and a lot of the backend stuff i produce ends up with a frontend so it makes sense to learn
44 2017-09-10 22:51:17 <esotericnonsense> the frontends are usually 'just get the job done' style affairs, but knowing JS better makes it far quicker/easier to maintain
45 2017-09-10 22:52:23 <esotericnonsense> then there was the time I hand rolled an entire site in JS and now i'm not sure i want to look at it again (doesn't this happen with all code eventually? :P)
46 2017-09-10 23:10:03 <esotericnonsense> hah using c3.js atm it uses 20% CPU just to have the points up. oh deary deary me.