1 2017-10-15 03:29:08 <jonasschnelli> iwkse: external disk drives (especially USB thumb drives) are not supported
 2 2017-10-15 03:29:22 <jonasschnelli> (by leveldb, the database library/layer used in Core)
 3 2017-10-15 03:30:14 <jonasschnelli> Though your pastebin shows nothing suspicious
 4 2017-10-15 04:59:35 <shmoon> anyone on ? :D
 5 2017-10-15 05:00:30 <iwkse> jonasschnelli: I've run bitcoin from my netbook and it didn't crash. It's an external driver usb, not a thumb drive. I don't know they are not supported
 6 2017-10-15 05:01:16 <jonasschnelli> iwkse: yeah. They not supported because they often do not work as intended (depends on the file system used on the external drive)
 7 2017-10-15 05:01:38 <jonasschnelli> The UTXO access also needs to be as fast as possible... therefore internal HDD/SSD are more sane
 8 2017-10-15 05:01:52 <jonasschnelli> If you want to reduce space, try pruning
 9 2017-10-15 05:02:35 <jonasschnelli> Or smylink out your blocks directory (thats the major part of the data that could be run on a USB drive: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Data_directory#Transferability)
10 2017-10-15 05:06:03 <iwkse> jonasschnelli: oh nice, that would be handy to just have the blocks on USB
11 2017-10-15 05:06:24 <jonasschnelli> iwkse: Yes. Sadly there is no out-of-the-box feature...
12 2017-10-15 05:07:04 <jonasschnelli> But also consider pruning. You have the same security as a standard full node but just discard the old block files (you no longer give blocks to other peers)
13 2017-10-15 05:07:24 <jonasschnelli> (startup -prune=550 [irreversible without re-downloading everything])
14 2017-10-15 05:09:03 <iwkse> ok thank you :)
15 2017-10-15 05:32:23 <shmoon> This section that talks about escrow https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide#escrow-and-arbitration
16 2017-10-15 05:32:27 <shmoon> mentions this "After looking at the evidence, Alice thinks a 40% refund is sufficient, so she creates and signs a transaction with two outputs, one that spends 60% of the satoshis to Bob’s public key and one that spends the remaining 40% to Charlie’s public key."
17 2017-10-15 05:32:33 <shmoon> Does it mean the transaction from Alice-the-arbitrator is a simple P2PKH one ?
18 2017-10-15 05:32:39 <shmoon> in that case the section should have said public key hash and not public key, no ?