1 2017-10-31 03:57:16 <rusty> Hmm, in my test suite, bitcoind is occasionally decoding a SW transaction wrong.  https://pastebin.com/U7tTJeYa  Any clues how this could happen?
 2 2017-10-31 04:03:08 <rusty> v0.14.2.0-gfc61c83 Hmm, maybe we should upgrade the docker img.
 3 2017-10-31 04:20:38 <achow101> rusty: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10481
 4 2017-10-31 04:22:15 <rusty> achow101: wait, what, decoderawtransaction tries to handle zero-input txs? FFS...
 5 2017-10-31 04:22:43 <achow101> rusty: yes, for fundrawtransaction
 6 2017-10-31 04:26:53 <rusty> achow101: hmm, this is valid.  my node decodes it fine.  I think this is actually a 0.14 bug.  I don't know why it doesn't fail all the time.
 7 2017-10-31 04:27:02 <rusty> (my node is 0.15)
 8 2017-10-31 04:27:27 <achow101> rusty: it is a specific bug in 0.13.x-0.14.x which was fixed in 0.15.x+ by the above pull request
 9 2017-10-31 04:27:41 <achow101> it is a bug specifically in decoderawtransaction and the functions it calls
10 2017-10-31 04:28:18 <rusty> achow101: ah, ack.  I missed the merge halfway through that conversation.  Thanks.
11 2017-10-31 12:51:11 <paulo_> hello
12 2017-10-31 12:51:28 <paulo_> is it okay to talk about the lightning network here?
13 2017-10-31 12:53:35 <sturles> Depends.  There is #lightning-dev as well.
14 2017-10-31 13:02:34 <paulo_> ok, thanks
15 2017-10-31 13:03:37 <wanna_be_dev> Hi guys. After updating my ubuntu 12.04 32 nodes to bitcoin 0.15 ( pruned), on each startup the client is doing a "Rewinding blocks" process which goes on for a while and afterwards the node operates as usual.
16 2017-10-31 13:03:56 <wanna_be_dev> I downgraded one of the nodes to 0.14.1 and got this message:  Unable to rewind the database to a pre-fork state. You will need to redownload the blockchain. Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
17 2017-10-31 13:04:52 <wanna_be_dev> What fork is it referring to? Reindexing all my nodes will be very time consuming so hopefully someone can help me out
18 2017-10-31 13:08:42 <paulo_> does the client reject blocks if it contains too few transactions?
19 2017-10-31 14:01:38 <sturles> No.