1 2017-11-30 05:31:10 <cluelessperson> Question, why can't we flatten block history to just recent blocks and addresses with funds?
 2 2017-11-30 05:51:19 <luke-jr> 1) addresses don't hold funds 2) you can't prove that data is correct
 3 2017-11-30 21:47:09 <cluelessperson> I think we should adopt bitcoin wallet naming convention
 4 2017-11-30 21:47:13 <cluelessperson> <DATE>_<COIN>_<LABEL>_<STATUS>
 5 2017-11-30 21:47:16 <cluelessperson> 20171130_BITCOIN_MyFirstWallet_empty
 6 2017-11-30 22:01:06 <wumpus> you can use any naming convention you want with -wallet=<name>
 7 2017-11-30 23:15:57 <roasbeef> who wants to mine testnet? :)
 8 2017-11-30 23:27:03 <wumpus> I don't have miners
 9 2017-11-30 23:27:50 <mlz> i don't either :/ if it could be done with cpu mining like ltc testnet i would already be doing it :/
10 2017-11-30 23:53:52 <wumpus> there have been times that BTC's testnet was easily CPU mineable but that's only after difficulty fallbacks
11 2017-11-30 23:54:07 <wumpus> if that was the case I doubt he'd be asking :)
12 2017-11-30 23:55:59 <eck> it's too bad BTC Foundation (or someone like that) doesn't mine on testnet as a public service, I was trying to test some SW transactions on testnet yesterday and it took forever to actually get my transaction included in a block
13 2017-11-30 23:57:12 <wumpus> at least there's regtest
14 2017-11-30 23:57:19 <eck> indeed